城市家庭住房不平等:户籍、禀赋还是城市特征？——基于广义有序模型与Oaxaca-Blinder分解

贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2020 ›› Issue (06): 64-74.

城市家庭住房不平等:户籍、禀赋还是城市特征？——基于广义有序模型与Oaxaca-Blinder分解

潘静¹, 杨扬²

1. 佛山科学技术学院经济管理学院, 广东佛山 528000;
2. 中山大学国际金融学院, 广东广州 510275

收稿日期:2020-04-28 出版日期:2020-11-15 发布日期:2020-11-19
作者简介:潘静(1983-),女,广东佛山人,经济学博士,佛山科学技术学院经济管理学院,讲师,研究方向为发展经济学、劳动经济学;杨扬(1982-),女,河南洛阳人,经济学博士,中山大学国际金融学院,副教授、博士生导师,研究方向为城市经济学、公共经济学。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究基金青年项目"大城市外来人口住房不平等研究：多维测度、互动机制与融合路径"（17YJC790113）。

The Determinants of Housing Inequality in Urban Households: Hukou, Endowment or Urban Characteristic?—Based on Generalized Ordered Model and Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition

PAN Jing¹, YANG Yang²

1. Foshan University, Foshan, Guangdong 528000, China;
2. Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China

Received:2020-04-28 Online:2020-11-15 Published:2020-11-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于中国劳动力动态调查（CLDS）数据，运用广义有序Logit模型实证分析户籍、家庭禀赋和城市特征三类因素对城市家庭住房不平等的影响；运用夏普利值分解、Oaxaca-Blinder分解区分"努力"和"环境"因素、户籍歧视和禀赋效应的贡献。研究发现：户籍可解释住房等级不平等的54.2%；"努力"因素对住房水平起正向作用；在户籍间住房等级不平等中户籍歧视效应占主导，在住房面积不平等中禀赋效应占主导，外地户口居民住房水平低源于"环境"因素趋弱，农业户口居民则源于"努力"和"环境"因素叠加趋弱；由于生活成本效应占主导，城市规模和流动人口占比越大，居民住房等级趋低，而城市土地供给增长有助于提升住房水平。

关键词: 住房不平等, 户籍, 禀赋, 城市特征, 广义有序Logit模型, Oaxaca-Blinder分解

Abstract: Using the data from China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS), and based on generalized ordered Logit model, this paper analyzes the influence of Hukou, endowment and urban characteristic on housing inequality empirically. Based on Shapley value decomposition and Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition, we distinguish the share between effort and circumstance causes, and the share between discrimination due to Hukou and endowment. We draw several conclusions. First, Hukou can explain 54.2% share of housing inequality. Second, effort cause acts positive effect on housing level. Third, discrimination effect of Hukou dominates in housing grade inequality, while endowment effect dominates in housing space inequality. The low housing level of migrants is due to inferior circumstance cause, while that of residents with agricultural Hukou is due to inferior effort and circumstance causes. Fourth, because of the domination of living cost effect, housing grade declines as city size and migrant proportion expanse. More urban land supply can enhance housing level.

Key words: housing inequality, Hukou, endowment, urban characteristic, generalized ordered Logit model, Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition

中图分类号:

F061.3
F293

潘静, 杨扬. 城市家庭住房不平等:户籍、禀赋还是城市特征？——基于广义有序模型与Oaxaca-Blinder分解[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2020(06): 64-74.

PAN Jing, YANG Yang. The Determinants of Housing Inequality in Urban Households: Hukou, Endowment or Urban Characteristic?—Based on Generalized Ordered Model and Oaxaca-Blinder Decomposition[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2020(06): 64-74.

参考文献

[1] Logan, J.R., Bian, Y., Bian, F., Housing Inequality in Urban China in the 1990s[J]. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 1999, 23(1):7~25.
[2] Eichholtz, P., Lindenthal, T., Demographics, Human Capital, and the Demand for Housing[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 2014(26):19~32.
[3] 何兴强,费怀玉.户籍与家庭住房模式选择[J].经济学(季刊),2018(2):527~548.
[4] Roemer, J.E. Equality of Opportunity[M]. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 2009.
[5] 王磊,原鹏飞,王康.是什么影响了中国城镇居民家庭的住房财产持有——兼论不同财富阶层的差异[J].统计研究,2016(12):44~57.
[6] 范晓光, 吕鹏. 找回代际视角:中国大都市的住房分异[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(6):177~187.
[7] Axel, B., Heiss, F., Seko, M., Housing Demand in Germany and Japan[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 2001, 10(3):0~252.
[8] 原鹏飞,王磊.我国城镇居民住房财富分配不平等及贡献率分解研究[J].统计研究,2013(12):69~76.
[9] Oktay, E., Karaaslan, A., Alkan, Ö., Çelik, A. K., Determinants of Housing Demand in the Erzurum Province, Turkey[J]. International Journal of Housing Markets & Analysis, 2014, 7(4):586~602.
[10] Green, R.K., Lee, H., Age, Demographics and the Demand for Housing, Revisited[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2016(61):86~98.
[11] 杨巧,杨扬长.租房还是买房——什么影响了流动人口住房选择[J].人口与经济,2018(6):101~111.
[12] Davis, M.A., Ortalo-Magné, F., Household Expenditures, Wages, Rents[J]. Review of Economic Dynamics, 2011, 14(2):248~261.
[13] Chiuri M.C., Jappelli, T., Do the Elderly Reduce Housing Equity? An International Comparison[J]. Journal of Population Economics, 2010, 23(2):643~663.
[14] Lauridsen, J., Skak, M., Determinants of Homeownership in Denmark[C]. Discussion Papers on Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark, 2007, No.2.
[15] 刘祖云,毛小平.中国城市住房分层:基于2010年广州市千户问卷调查[J].中国社会科学,2012(2):94~109.
[16] D`Costa, S., Overman, H.G., The Urban Wage Growth Premium:Sorting or Learning?[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2014(48):168~179.
[17] 踪家峰,周亮.大城市支付了更高的工资吗?[J].经济学(季刊),2015(4):1467~1496.
[18] Mussa, A., Nwaogu, U.G., Pozo, S., Immigration and Housing:A Spatial Econometric Analysis[J]. Journal of Housing Economics, 2017(35):13~25.
[19] 陆铭,欧海军,陈斌开.理性还是泡沬:对城市化、移民和房价的经验研究[J].世界经济,2014(1):30~54.
[20] 周怀康,彭秋萍,孙博,姜军辉.谁在助推房价?——基于中国高层次流动人口的经验证据[J].中国经济问题,2019(1):93~105.
[21] Ihlanfeldt, K.R., The Effect of Land Use Regulation on Housing and Land Prices[J]. Journal of Urban Economics, 2007, 61(3):420~435.
[22] 张清源,苏国灿,梁若冰.增加土地供给能否有效抑制房价上涨——利用"撤县设区"的准实验研究[J].财贸经济,2018(4):20~34.
[23] 余吉祥,沈坤荣.城市建设用地指标的配置逻辑及其对住房市场的影响[J].经济研究,2019(4):116~132.
[24] 韩立彬,陆铭.供需错配:解开中国房价分化之谜[J].世界经济,2018(10):126~149.
[25] 范剑勇,莫家伟,张吉鹏.居住模式与中国城镇化——基于土地供给视角的经验研究[J].中国社会科学,2015(4):44~63.
[26] 张莉,年永威,皮嘉勇,周越.土地政策:供地结构与房价[J].经济学报2017(1):91~118.
[27] 陈淑云,王翔翔,王佑辉."两轮限购"对住房价格的动态影响[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019(1):38~49.
[28] 朱恺容,李培,谢贞发.房地产限购政策的有效性及外部性评估[J].财贸经济,2019(2):147~160.
[29] 罗楚亮.城镇居民住房面积的不平等——基于2000年和2005年人口调查的经验分析[J].学海,2014(1):80~90.
[30] Fernandes, C., Crespo, N., Simoes, N., Poverty, Richness, and Inequality:Evidence for Portugal Using a Housing Comfort Index[J]. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 2017, 41(4):371~394.
[31] Williams, R., Understanding and Interpreting Generalized Ordered Logit Models[J]. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2016, 40(1):7~20.
[32] Oaxaca, R. Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets[J]. International Economic Review, 1973, 14(3):693~709.
[33] Blinder A.S. Wage Discrimination:Reduced Form and Structural Estimates[J]. Journal of Human Resources, 1973, 8(4):436~455.