贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2026 ›› Issue (04): 49-61.

• 乡村振兴 • 上一篇    

“智理”变“滞理”?乡村治理中数字嵌入异化的生成——基于压力型体制视角

邓崧, 张美娟   

  1. 云南大学 政府管理学院, 云南 昆明 650500
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-09 发布日期:2026-07-22
  • 作者简介:邓崧(1974—),男,四川中江人,云南大学政府管理学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向为数字治理与公共管理方法;张美娟(1997—),女,云南楚雄人,云南大学政府管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为数字治理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重点项目"新时代数字强边研究:基础理论、战略逻辑、模型建构与管理实践"(22FGLA001);云南大学哲学社会科学创新团队项目"数字政府及其在边疆治理现代化中的实践"(CY2262420227)。

From "Smart Governance" to "Stagnant Governance"? The Generation of Digital Embedding Alienation in Rural Governance: A Pressure-Based System Perspective

DENG Song, ZHANG Meijuan   

  1. School of Government, Yunnan University, Yunnan 650500
  • Received:2025-12-09 Published:2026-07-22

摘要: 乡村数字治理是激发乡村振兴内生动力的关键路径。然而,数字技术在乡村治理中的实际应用非但未能达到预期效果,反而衍生出新的治理问题,致使治理实践从"智理"异化为"滞理"。为解释此现象,研究提出"乡村治理中的数字嵌入异化"这一理论概念,基于对Y省首批13个数字乡村试点县(市、区)的实地调查,运用Gioia方法划分异化类型,并构建压力型体制下的"制度—行为"分析框架剖析其生成机理。研究发现,乡村治理中的数字嵌入异化主要表现为结构嵌入异化、关系嵌入异化与资源嵌入异化三种核心类型。从压力型体制的理论视角审视,数字嵌入异化的生成并非源于技术失范或个体行为偏差,而是制度压力的内在诱因与行动者适应行为共同作用的结果。压力型体制通过任务量化分解、考核、问责等机制,系统驱动地方政府、基层干部、村民等乡村行动主体采取适应性策略,进而催生不同类型的数字嵌入异化。

关键词: 乡村数字治理, 乡村治理, 数字治理, 数字嵌入异化

Abstract: Rural digital governance constitutes a critical pathway for stimulating the endogenous dynamics of rural revitalization. However, the practical application of digital technology in rural governance has not only failed to yield the anticipated results but has also spawned new governance conundrums, causing governance practice to degenerate from "smart governance" to "stagnant governance". To explicate this phenomenon, this study introduces the theoretical concept of "digital embedding alienation in rural governance". Based on fieldwork conducted in the first batch of 13 pilot counties (including county-level cities and districts) for digital rural development in Province Y, this study utilizes the Gioia methodology to classify alienation types and constructs the institution-behavior analytical framework within the context of the pressure-based system to dissect its generative mechanisms.The findings reveal that digital embedding alienation in rural governance primarily manifests in three core types: structural embedding alienation, relational embedding alienation, and resource embedding alienation. Viewed through the theoretical lens of the pressure-based system, the generation of digital embedding alienation stems not from technological anomie or individual behavioral deviations, but rather from the interaction between the internal inducements of institutional pressure and the adaptive behaviors of actors. Specifically, the pressure-based system systematically drives rural actors—including local governments, grassroots cadres, and villagers—to adopt adaptive behaviors through mechanisms such as quantitative task decomposition, performance evaluation, and accountability. This process, in turn, engenders distinct types of digital embedding alienation.

Key words: rural digital governance, rural governance, digital governance, digital embedding alienation

中图分类号: