健康冲击对农户民间借贷参与的影响——来自于CHARLS数据的经验证据

›› 2016 ›› Issue (02): 80-89.

健康冲击对农户民间借贷参与的影响——来自于CHARLS数据的经验证据

杨青¹, 马超², 刘维忠³

1. 新疆农业大学经济与贸易学院, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052;
2. 中国人民大学经济学院, 北京 100872;
3. 新疆农业大学经济与贸易学院, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2016-01-05 出版日期:2016-03-15 发布日期:2016-03-15
作者简介:杨青(1988-),男,安徽芜湖人,新疆农业大学经贸学院管理学硕士生,研究方向为农村金融;马超(1995-),男,安徽六安人,中国人民大学经济学院经济学学士生,研究方向为人力资本与金融;刘维忠(1961-),男,新疆乌鲁木齐人,管理学博士,教授,研究方向为农业发展战略与投资。
基金资助:
本文受到"新疆人文社科重点基地干旱区农村发展研究中心课题"(XJEDU030114Y12)的资助。

Influence of Health Shocks on Farmers' Participation in Private Lending-Empirical Evidence from CHARLS Data

YANG Qing¹, MA Chao², LIU Wei-zhong³

1. School of Economics and Trade Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China;
2. School of Economics Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China;
3. School of Economics and Trade Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China

Received:2016-01-05 Online:2016-03-15 Published:2016-03-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS)2013年全国25个省份6220个农户家庭层面的样本,并运用Logit模型实证分析健康冲击对农户参与民间借贷的影响。实证结果表明:第一,不同类型的健康冲击对农户参与民间借贷的影响不同。慢性健康冲击变量对农户民间借贷参与的影响不显著,而急性健康冲击变量对农户参与民间借贷有着显著的正向影响。第二,不同健康冲击对农户民间借贷参与的影响存在年龄与婚姻状况差异。在年龄差异方面,慢性健康冲击对老年农户与中年农户参与民间借贷的影响均不显著,而急性健康冲击对中年农户参与民间借贷有着显著的正向影响,但对老年农户的影响不显著。在婚姻状况差异方面,慢性健康冲击对非婚状况与已婚状况的农户参与民间借贷的影响都不显著,而急性健康冲击对非婚状况的农户参与民间借贷没有显著影响,对已婚状况的农户参与民间借贷有着显著的正向影响。

关键词: 慢性健康冲击, 急性健康冲击, 民间借贷, CHARLS

Abstract: This paper, based on 6220 farmers' family samples of 25 provinces by China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study(CHARLS) in 2013 and using the Logit Model, has empirically analyzed the impact of health shocks on farmers' participation in private lending.The results are as follows:First,different health shocks have different effect on farmers' participation in private lending.The chronic health shocks have no significant influence on farmers' participation, but the acute health shocks have a positive impact on it. Second, the effects of different health shocks on farmers' participation are different in terms of age and marriage.In the respect of age difference, chronic health shocks have no influence on both the old and the middle-aged farmers' participation in private lending.Acute health shocks have a positive effect on the middle-aged farmers' participation, but no significant impact on the old farmers' participation. In the respect of marriage difference, chronic health shocks have no significant influence on both the married and the unmarried farmers' participation. Acute health shocks have no impact on the unmarried farmers' participation, but have a positive effect on the married farmers' participation in private lending.

Key words: chronic health shocks, acute health shocks, private lending, CHARLS

中图分类号:

F832

杨青, 马超, 刘维忠. 健康冲击对农户民间借贷参与的影响——来自于CHARLS数据的经验证据[J]. , 2016(02): 80-89.

YANG Qing, MA Chao, LIU Wei-zhong. Influence of Health Shocks on Farmers' Participation in Private Lending-Empirical Evidence from CHARLS Data[J]. , 2016(02): 80-89.

参考文献

[1] 曹力群.农村金融体制改革与农户借贷行为研究[R].课题报告, 2002.

[2] 何军,宁满秀,史清华. 农户民间借贷需求及影响因素实证研究——基于江苏省390户农户调查数据分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2005(4):20-24.

[3] 张改清. 农户民间借贷需求影响因素的经验分析——基于河南省的调查[J]. 商业研究, 2008(7):174-177.

[4] 秦建群,秦建国,吕忠伟. 农户信贷渠道选择行为:中国农村的实证研究[J]. 财贸经济, 2011(9):55-62+106.

[5] 孔繁荣,谭运进,丁士军. 大病风险下农户民间借贷影响因素分析[J]. 开发研究, 2014(4):9-13.

[6] 丁志国,徐德财. 被动选择还是主观偏好:农户融资为何更加倾向民间渠道[J]. 农业技术经济, 2014(11):52-64.

[7] 黎翠梅,陈巧玲. 农户民间借贷需求影响因素的实证研究——以湘北234户农户的调查为例[J]. 经济问题, 2007(11):71-73.

[8] 赵炳奇. 农户民间借贷信贷配给——来自600农户融资的实证考察[J]. 社会科学战线, 2010,(4):65-71.

[9] Jodha N S.Common Property Resources and Rural Poverty in Dry Regions of India[J]. Economic and Political Weekly,1990(21):1169-1181.

[10] Knack S,Keefer P. Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-country Investigation[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1997,112(4):1251-1288.

[11] Grootaert C,Van Bastlaer T. 社会资本在发展中的作用[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2004:323.

[12] 杨汝岱,陈斌开,朱诗娥. 基于社会网络视角的农户民间借贷需求行为研究[J]. 经济研究, 2011(11):116-129.

[13] Courney C.Coile. Health Shocks and Couples Labor Supply Decisions,Working Paper, NBER, No.10180,2004.

[14] Nabanita D. Grupt et al. The Effect of an Acute Health Shock on Work Behavior:Evidence from Different Health Care Regimes, Discussion Paper, Institute for the Study of Labor(IZA),No.5843, 2011.

[15] 张川川. 健康变化对劳动供给和收入影响的实证分析[J]. 经济评论, 2011(4):79-88.

[16] 解垩. 健康对劳动力退出的影响[J]. 世界经济文汇, 2011(1):109-120.

[17] 刘生龙,李军. 健康、劳动参与及中国农村老年贫困[J]. 中国农村经济, 2012(1):56-68.

[18] Alan Duncan et al. The Influence of Psychological Well-being, Ill Health and Health Shocks on Single Parents' Labour Supply, Working Paper.Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), No WP1307,2013.

[19] Islam, A., and Maitra, P..Health shocks and consumption smoothing in rural households:Does microcredit have a role to play?. Journal of Development Economics, 2012,97(2):232-243.

[20] Love, David A. and Paul A. Smith. Does health affect portfolio choice? Health Economics. 2010;19(2):1441-1460.

[21] 吴卫星,荣苹果,徐芊. 健康与家庭资产选择[J]. 经济研究, 2011(S1):43-54.

[22] 解垩,孙桂茹. 健康冲击对中国老年家庭资产组合选择的影响[J]. 人口与发展, 2012(4):47-55.

[23] 陈琪,刘卫. 健康支出对居民资产选择行为的影响——基于同质性与异质性争论的探讨[J]. 上海经济研究, 2014(6):111-118.

[24] 高梦滔,姚洋. 健康风险冲击对农户收入的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2005(12):15-25.

[25] 高梦滔,甘立,徐立新,等. 健康风险冲击下的农户收入能力与村级民主[J]. 中国人口科学, 2006(1):21-32+95.

[26] 周广肃,樊纲,申广军. 收入差距、社会资本与健康水平——基于中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的实证分析[J]. 管理世界, 2014(7):12-21;51;187.

[27] 方迎风,邹薇. 能力投资、健康冲击与贫困脆弱性[J]. 经济学动态, 2013(7):36-50.

[28] 洪秋妹. 健康冲击与农户贫困动态变化浅析[J]. 合作经济与科技, 2014(24):9-11.

[29] 乔勇,丁士军. 贫困地区农户应对疾病的筹资及效果——基于四川省阆中市的农户调查[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2009(7):16-19.

[30] Mark B. McClellan. Health Events, Health Insurance, and Labor Supply:Evidence from the Health and Retirement Survey, Frontiers in the Economics of Aging, Chicago:University of Chicago Press.1998.

[31] Zhao Y.; Strauss J.; Park A. and Sun Y.. China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, Pilot,User's Guide, Working Paper, National School of Development Peking University, 2009.

[32] 卢亚娟,张龙耀,许玉韫. 金融可得性与农村家庭创业——基于CHARLS数据的实证研究[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2014(10):89-99.

[33] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M]. 上海:上海人民出版社, 2006.