什么引致了农村居民贫困风险——来自贫困脆弱性测度和分解的证据

›› 2018 ›› Issue (01): 91-102.

什么引致了农村居民贫困风险——来自贫困脆弱性测度和分解的证据

黄潇

重庆工商大学长江上游经济研究中心, 重庆 400067

收稿日期:2017-09-17 出版日期:2018-01-15 发布日期:2018-03-06
作者简介:黄潇(1982-),男,重庆人,副教授,经济学博士、博士后,重庆工商大学经济学院院长助理、长江上游经济研究中心研究人员,研究方向为贫困治理、收入分配与人力资本。
基金资助:
国家社科基金"新型城镇化进程中教育公平扭转贫困代际传递研究"（14CJL012）；重庆市第三批青年骨干教师支持计划"基于多维风险指数的贫困预警及风险干预机制研究"。

What leads to the rural household's risk of poverty-Measurement and decomposition of poverty vulnerability

HUANG Xiao

Economic Research Center of upper Yangtze River, Chongqing Technology and Business University, Chongqing 400067, China

Received:2017-09-17 Online:2018-01-15 Published:2018-03-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 对贫困风险成因的分析有助于更具前瞻性地推进精准扶贫。采用CLDS数据测度了表征贫困风险的贫困脆弱性，采用基于R²的夏普里值分解法分析了引致因素及贡献度，并运用Order Probit模型考察了贫困脆弱的转换动因。研究发现，个体具备更高教育水平和社会资本、从事非农工作、迁移，以及家庭获得融资都有助于降低贫困脆弱性，但父辈劣势的代际传递会提升贫困脆弱性；个体在教育、非农就业以及健康方面的差异对贫困脆弱性贡献最大；有9%和24%的个体分别经历过持续性脆弱和暂时性脆弱，健康冲击是导致转换到（或持续陷入）贫困脆弱的重要原因。因此，系统性的扶贫策略需要在当前促进贫困群体的非农就业，并持续通过教育和健康扶贫来阻断贫困陷阱。

关键词: 贫困风险, 贫困脆弱性, 夏普里值分解

Abstract: Analyzing the origin of the poverty helps to reduce poverty predicted. Based on the CLDS data, this paper firstly measures the rural household's poverty vulnerability; then answer a question that which economic-social status contributes to the poverty vulnerability most, by the method of Shapley Value Decomposition; and finally analyzes the dynamic reason of status transformation in poverty vulnerability using Order Probit model. Results Show that individual factors such as education, non-agricultural job, social capital and immigration, family background including productive loan all help to decrease the poverty vulnerability; however, the disadvantage from intergenerational transfer leads to higher poverty vulnerability. According to the contributions, the difference among individual's education, non-agricultural job and health explain most part of poverty vulnerability. In addition, 9% and 24% of samples have fell into transient and persistent poverty vulnerability respectively, and healthy problems are viewed as the main reason of translating to higher poverty vulnerability. Consequently, the systematic poverty reduction solutions should not only pay attention to the poor's no-agricultural job opportunities right now, but also take some measures including education and health to eliminate the poverty trap in the long time.

Key words: poverty risk, poverty vulnerability, shapley value decomposition

中图分类号:

F061.3

黄潇. 什么引致了农村居民贫困风险——来自贫困脆弱性测度和分解的证据[J]. , 2018(01): 91-102.

HUANG Xiao. What leads to the rural household's risk of poverty-Measurement and decomposition of poverty vulnerability[J]. , 2018(01): 91-102.

参考文献

[1] Chaudhuri S,Jalan J,Suryahadi A.Assessing Household Vulnerability to Poverty from Cross-Sectional Data:A Methodology and Estimates from Indonesia[J].Discussion Papers,Department of Economics,Columbia University,2002.

[2] Zhang Yuan and Wan Guanghua.An Empirical Analysis of Household Vulnerability in Rural China[J].Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy,2006,11(2):196-212.

[3] 李丽,白雪梅.我国城乡居民家庭贫困脆弱性的测度与分解——基于CHNS微观数据的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010(8):61-73.

[4] 万广华,刘飞,章元.资产视角下的贫困脆弱性分解:基于中国农户面板数据的经验分析[J].中国农村经济,2014(4):4-19.

[5] 黄潇.健康在多大程度上引致贫困脆弱性——基于CHNS农村数据的经验分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2013(9):54-62.

[6] 方迎风,邹薇.能力投资、健康冲击与贫困脆弱性[J].经济学动态,2013(7):36-49.

[7] 韩静舒,谢邦昌.中国居民家庭脆弱性及因病致贫效应分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2016(7):36-49.

[8] 樊丽明,解垩.公共转移支付减少了贫困脆弱性吗?[J].经济研究,2014(8):67-78.

[9] 李齐云,席华.新农保对家庭贫困脆弱性的影响——基于中国家庭追踪调查数据的研究[J].上海经济研究,2015(7):45-54.

[10] Jesper J.Kuhl.Disaggregating Household Vulnerability-Analyzing fluctuations in consumption using a simulation approach[D].Institute of Economics,University of Copenhagen,Denmark,2003.

[11] 万广华,章元,史清华.如何更准确地预测贫困脆弱性:基于中国农户面板数据的比较研究[J].农业技术经济,2011(9):13-23.

[12] Amemiya T.The maximum likelihood estimator and the non-linear three stage least squares estimator in the general nonlinear simultaneous equation model[J].Econometrica,1977,45:995-968.

[13] Huettner F,Sunder M.Axiomatic arguments for decomposing goodness of fit according to Shapley and Owen values[J].Electronic Journal of Statistics,2012,vol(6):1239-1250.

[14] Zhang Huafeng.The poverty trap of education:Education-poverty connections in Western China[J].International Journal of Educational Development,vol(38),2014:47-58.

[15] 程明望,Jin Yanhong,盖庆恩,史清华.农村减贫应该更关注教育还是健康?——基于收入增长和差距缩小双重视角的实证[J].经济研究,2014(11):130-144.

[16] 岳希明,罗楚亮.农村劳动力外出打工与缓解贫困[J].世界经济,2010(1):84-98.

[17] 张爽,陆铭,章元.社会资本的作用随市场化进程减弱还是加强?——来自中国农村贫困的实证研究[J].经济学(季刊),6(2),2007:539-560.

[18] 周晔馨,叶静怡.社会资本在减轻农村贫困中的作用:文献述评与研究展望[J].南方经济,2014(7):35-57.

[19] 方迎风,张芬.邻里效应作用下的人口流动与中国农村贫困动态[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016(10):137-163.

[20] 吕勇斌,赵培培.我国农村金融发展与反贫困绩效:基于2003-2010年的经验证据[J].农业经济问题,2014(1):54-60.

[21] 邸玉娜.代际流动、教育收益与机会平等——基于微观调查数据的研究[J].经济科学,2014(1):65-74.

[22] 沈扬扬.收入增长与不平等对农村贫困的影响——基于不同经济活动类型农户的研究[J].南开经济研究,2012(2):132-150.

[23] 邰秀军,罗丞,李树茁,李聪.外出务工对贫困脆弱性的影响:来自西部山区农户的证据[J].世界经济文汇,2009(6):67-76.

[24] 关爱萍,李静宜.人力资本、社会资本与农户贫困——基于甘肃省贫困村的实证分析[J].教育与经济,2017(1):66-74.

[25] 黄斌,高蒙蒙,查晨婷.中国农村地区教育收益与收入差异[J].中国农村经济,2014(11):28-38.

[26] 黄潇.如何预防贫困的马太效应——代际收入流动视角[J].经济管理,2014(5):153-161.