文化产业扶贫政策的增收和减贫效应:微观机制和贵州农民画的经验

贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2020 ›› Issue (02): 84-97.

文化产业扶贫政策的增收和减贫效应:微观机制和贵州农民画的经验

叶林¹, 李艳琼¹, 方峥², 余江³, 郭子桢⁴

1. 华中师范大学, 湖北武汉 430079;
2. 新加坡社会科学大学, 新加坡 599494;
3. 武汉大学, 湖北武汉 430072;
4. 爱荷华州立大学, 爱荷华埃姆斯 50011

收稿日期:2019-09-26 出版日期:2020-03-15 发布日期:2020-03-24
作者简介:叶林(1978-),女,浙江宁波人,经济学博士,理论经济学博士后,华中师范大学国家文化产业研究中心副教授,研究方向为文化产业研究;李艳琼(1994-),女,贵州六盘水人,华中师范大学国家文化产业研究中心2016级硕士研究生,研究方向为文化产业研究;方峥(1986-),女,湖北武汉人,经济学博士,理论经济学博士后,新加坡社会科学大学商学院助理教授,研究方向为应用微观经济学和劳动经济学研究;余江(1978-),男,湖北宜昌人,经济学博士,武汉大学人口资源环境经济研究中心副教授,研究方向为自然资源经济学和产业组织理论研究;郭子桢(1986-),湖北黄冈人,经济学博士,爱荷华州立大学经济学系助理教授,研究方向为区域经济学。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"新型城镇化过程中农业转移人口市民化关键问题研究"（16JJD790044）；华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务项目"丹桂计划"项目（CCNU15A03007）。

Income Increase And Poverty Reduction Effect of Cultural Industries Poverty Alleviation: Theory and Experience from Farmer Paintings in Guizhou Province

YE Lin¹, LI Yan-qiong¹, FANG Zheng², YU Jiang³, GUO Zi-zhen⁴

1. Central China Normal University, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China;
2. Singapore University of Social Sciences, Singapore 599494, Singapore;
3. Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430072, China;
4. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

Received:2019-09-26 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-03-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于贫困家庭微观决策的文化产业扶贫模型显示，该政策促使贫困家庭生产将有限劳动时间配置到边际产出更高的文化产品生产，并最终增加人均家庭收入和提高福利水平。为测度文化产业扶贫的增收和减贫效果并验证其微观作用机制，实证部分利用2006~2017年世界银行贵州调查项目的农村家庭微观定点追踪调查数据，采用倍差法（DID）对2013年开始试点的贵州水城县农民画产业扶贫项目进行政策效果估计。结果显示，相对于不受政策影响的控制组，该政策可导致参与该项目的贫困家庭年人均收入增长额外提高22.6%，且在考虑政策强度和政策质量差异后其增收效应仍然显著。以文化产品劳动时间为中介变量的中介效应分析显示，该扶贫政策通过增加贫困家庭的文化产品生产时间和文化产品销售收入间接提高家庭人均收入，政策导致贫困家庭平均每年额外投入348小时进行文化产品生产并获得9670元的农民画销售收入。此外，对该政策的年度和累计脱贫率估计显示文化产业扶贫具有显著的减贫效果，项目覆盖的8个村民小组年均和累计脱贫率分别额外提高7.69%和13.82%。最后，对文化产业政策的年度效应估计还显示，文化产业扶贫政策在考察期内存在持续增收和稳定脱贫的性质。

关键词: 文化产业扶贫, 农业家庭模型, 农民画, 倍差法

Abstract: The cultural industries poverty alleviation model based on household model shows that the policy not only changes household's production and family welfare level by investing cultural resources, but also reduces the resource and environmental constraints in poor areas. In addition, the non-competitiveness of intangible inputs of production reduces the cost of poverty alleviation and stabilizes poverty alleviation. The Evaluation of Farmer Painting Poverty Alleviation Project in Guizhou using the difference in difference (DID) and the data of the rural family survey data of the World Bank(2006-2017) finds the policy can lead to an additional 22.6% increase in the annual per capita income growth of poor families, and the effect is still significant after considering the policy intensity and quality. According to theory of mediation effects, the policy indirectly increases the per capita income of families by increasing the production time and sales income of cultural products, which results in the poor families to invest an additional 348 hours of cultural product production every year and obtain 9670 yuan of sales income of farmers' paintings. Estimates of the annual and cumulative poverty reduction rates show that the policy also has significant poverty reduction effects. The average annual and cumulative poverty reduction rates of the eight village groups covered by the project can be increased by 7.69% and 13.82% respectively. The estimated annual effect of the policy shows that the cultural industries poverty alleviation project can increase income and alleviate poverty.

Key words: cultural industrial poverty alleviation, agricultural household model, farmer painting, DID

中图分类号:

F061.6

叶林, 李艳琼, 方峥, 余江, 郭子桢. 文化产业扶贫政策的增收和减贫效应:微观机制和贵州农民画的经验[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2020(02): 84-97.

YE Lin, LI Yan-qiong, FANG Zheng, YU Jiang, GUO Zi-zhen. Income Increase And Poverty Reduction Effect of Cultural Industries Poverty Alleviation: Theory and Experience from Farmer Paintings in Guizhou Province[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2020(02): 84-97.

参考文献

[1] 习近平.习近平扶贫论述摘编——在打好精准脱贫攻坚战座谈会上的讲话[M].中央文献出版,2018:83~84.
[2] Choi, Jong-Ryeol., Kim, Dong-Hwan. A Study on the Vitalizations of Local Cultural Contents Industry by Contents Value Assessment (COVA) System Development[J]. Humanities Contents, 2010, 17(3):253~277.
[3] Thorne, KMM., Thorne, LMM., Albor, GJR. Innovation, Cultural Industries And Local Development[J]. Dimension Empresarial, 2017, 15(1):279~302.
[4] 齐勇锋,吴莉.特色文化产业发展研究[J].中国特色社会主义研究,2013(5):90~96.
[5] 周建军,张爱民.论特色文化产业的内涵和发展途径[J].社会科学研究,2016(6):119~121.
[6] 范建华.中国特色文化与特色文化产业论纲[J].学术探索,2017(12):114~124.
[7] Young-Kyu, Jeong. Malaysian Cultural Characteristics and Growth Prospects of the Content Industry Focusing on Broadcasting and Music Album[J]. Annals of Korean Association of the Islamic Studies. 2013, 23(5):57~98.
[8] Roberto Suárez, Catalina González, Carrasquilla G. An Ecosystem Perspective in the Socio-Cultural Evaluation of Dengue in Two Colombian Towns[J]. Journal of Public Health, 2009, 25(1):104~114.
[9] Della Lucia, M., Segre, G. Intersectoral Local Development in Italy:The Cultural, Creative and Tourism Industries[J]. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2017, 11(3):450~462.
[10] Lee, Joon-Ho., Kyung, Won Suk. Operational Strategies of Cultural Contents Industry Cluster in Busan:Based on In-depth Interviews with Local Experts on Cultural Industries[J]. Journal of Communication Science, 2017, 17(4):242~270.
[11] Anderson, W. Cultural Tourism and Poverty Alleviation in Rural Kilimanjaro, Tanzania[J]. Journal of Tourism And Cultural Change, 2015,13(3):208~224.
[12] Kimaro, M.E., Ndlovu, J. Evaluating the Role of Small Private Tourism Businesses in Poverty Alleviation:A Corporate Social Responsibility Approach in Namibia[J], Journal of Human Ecology, 2017, 58(3):132~145.
[13] Njoya, E.T., Seetaram, N. Tourism Contribution to Poverty Alleviation in Kenya:A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Analysis[J]. Journal Of Travel Research. 2018, 57(4):513~524.
[14] Liorca-Rodriguez, C.M., Casas-Jurado, A.C., Garcia-Fernandez, R.M. Tourism And Poverty Alleviation:An Empirical Analysis Using Panel Data On Peru's Departments[J]. International Journal of Tourism Research, 2017, 19(6):746~756.
[15] 肖勉之.构建贵州省文化产业扶贫机制的思考[J].中共贵州省委党校学报,2009(4):69~71.
[16] 胥悦红.全球化时代的民族地区文化产业发展研究——基于文化资源商业模式与全产业链建构的探讨[J].学术前沿,2016(11):70~85.
[17] 熊正贤.特色文化产业扶贫的特征分析与绩效问题研究——以武陵山区为例[J]. 云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(4):108~115.
[18] 赵迎芳.当代中国文化扶贫存在的问题与对策[J].理论学刊,2017(5):113~120.
[19] Singh, L., Squire, and J. Strauss, eds. Agricultural Household Models:Extensions, Applications, and Policy[M]. The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986a:71~91.
[20] Varian, H.R. Microeconomic Analysis[M]. 3rd Ed. W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1992.
[21] Reid, M.D. The Economics of Household Production[M]. New York:Wiley, 1934.
[22] Mincer, J. Market Prices, Opportunity Costs, and Income Effects[C]. In Measurement in Economics, C. Christ, ed. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press, 1963:66~82.
[23] Becker, G.S. A Theory of the Allocation of Time[J]. The Economic Journal,1965, 75(299):493~517.
[24] Iqbal, Farrukh. The Demand and Supply of Funds among Agricultural Households in India[C]. In Singh, Squire and Strauss ed., Agricultural Household Models:Application and Policy. Baltimore and London:John Hopkins University Press, 1986:183~205.