绿水青山保护有利于地区反贫困吗——来自长江经济带沿线贫困地区的新证据

贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2020 ›› Issue (04): 78-88.

绿水青山保护有利于地区反贫困吗——来自长江经济带沿线贫困地区的新证据

段龙龙¹, 王林梅²

1. 四川大学经济学院, 四川成都 610065;
2. 四川大学马克思主义学院, 四川成都 610065

收稿日期:2019-11-04 出版日期:2020-07-15 发布日期:2020-07-16
作者简介:段龙龙(1988-),男,陕西西安人,四川大学经济学院副教授,研究方向为政治经济学;王林梅(1987-),女,四川遂宁人,四川大学马克思主义学院副研究员,研究方向为人口学。
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学基金青年项目"新时代我国城镇化与逆城镇化协调发展路径研究"（19YJC710016）；中国博士后面上基金特别资助项目"四川藏区易地扶贫搬迁户多元生计方式适应力调查与评估"（2019T120830）；四川大学中国特色社会主义政治经济学研究中心项目"西部地区城镇化与财政支农协同减贫机制研究"资助。

Is the Protection of Green Water and Green Hills Conducive to Regional Anti-Poverty-New Evidence from Poor Areas Along the Yangtze River Economic Belt

DUAN Long-long¹, WANG Lin-mei²

1. Sichuan university School of Economics, Chengdu Sichuan 610065, China;
2. Sichuan university School of Marxism, Chengdu Sichuan 610065, China

Received:2019-11-04 Online:2020-07-15 Published:2020-07-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 保护绿水青山实现绿色减贫是习近平总书记"两山理论"的核心要义之一。在构建绿水青山保护减贫机制的理论框架基础上，借助面板可行广义最小二乘模型（FGLS）和面板联立方程模型（PSEM）深入探讨了长江经济带沿线76个地市州的绿水青山保护与地区反贫困间的关系。研究表明：以改善生态质量为目标的绿水青山保护与地区贫困间呈现出显著U型关联；以积累生态资本为目标的绿水青山保护与地区贫困间表现为特定的倒U型关系；绿水青山保护推动地区贫困削减的两大支撑机制是绿色产业的壮大和贫困群体健康人力资本水平扩张；绿水青山保护具有明显"益贫"特征，对于居民收入水平改善边际要显著弱于能力贫困改善边际，因此需进一步加强与基础设施建设、城镇化、政府财政能力及开放等减贫因素协同。

关键词: 绿水青山保护, 反贫困, 长江经济带, 环境贫困陷阱

Abstract: Protecting green water and mountains to achieve green poverty reduction is one of the core elements of General Secretary Xi Jinping's "Two Mountain Theory". Based on the theoretical framework of reconstructing the Green River Green Mountain Protection Poverty Reduction Mechanism, This paper explores the relationship between the green hills protection and the regional anti-poverty in 76 cities and counties along the Yangtze River Economic Belt by means of the panel feasible generalized least squares model (FGLS) and the panel simultaneous equation model (PSEM). The study found that there is a significant "U"-type association between the conservation behavior of green water and green hills for the purpose of improving ecological quality and regional poverty. The protection of green water and green hills with the goal of accumulating ecological capital is characterized by a specific inverted "U" relationship between regional poverty. The two major supporting mechanisms for green water and green hills protection for regional poverty reduction are the continued growth of green industries and the expansion of healthy human capital levels of poor groups. Although the protection of green water and mountains has a clear "pro-poor" character, the margin of improvement in the income level of residents is significantly weaker than the margin of improvement in capacity poverty, and therefore needs to be further strengthened in synergy with poverty reduction factors such as infrastructure construction, urbanization, government financial capacity and openness.

Key words: green water and green hill protection, anti-poverty, yangtze river economic belt, environmental poverty trap

中图分类号:

F061.3

段龙龙, 王林梅. 绿水青山保护有利于地区反贫困吗——来自长江经济带沿线贫困地区的新证据[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2020(04): 78-88.

DUAN Long-long, WANG Lin-mei. Is the Protection of Green Water and Green Hills Conducive to Regional Anti-Poverty-New Evidence from Poor Areas Along the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2020(04): 78-88.

参考文献

[1] 王林梅,段龙龙.长江经济带绿色发展的政治经济学思辨[J].海派经济学,2018(4):127~141.
[2] 王景通,林建华."金山银山"与"绿水青山"关系的逻辑理路[J].学习与探索,2019(6):28~32.
[3] 史玉成.生态扶贫:精准扶贫与生态保护的结合路径[J].甘肃社会科学,2018(6):169~176.
[4] 王会,姜雪梅,陈建成,等."绿水青山"与"金山银山"关系的经济理论解析[J].中国农村经济,2017(4):2~12.
[5] 祁毓,卢洪友."环境贫困陷阱"发生机理与中国环境拐点[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2015(10):71~78.
[6] Rostami F, Sadati A.Poverty alleviation and sustainable development:the role of social capital[J]. Journal of Social Science,2008(3):202~215.
[7] 祁新华,林荣平,程煜,等.贫困与生态环境相互关系研究述评[J].地理科学,2013(12):1498~1504.
[8] Khan.H,Poverty. environment and economic growth:exploring the links among three complex issues with specific focus on the Pakistan's case[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2008(10):913~929.
[9] 李楠,石智雷,杨雨萱.贫困地区的环境保护:库区居民的环保意识与行为[J].农业经济问题,2018(7):129~139.
[10] Rizk.R,Slimane.M.B.Modelling the relationship between poverty, environment, and institutions:a panel data study[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2018(25):31459~31473.
[11] Schleicher.J,Schaafsma.M.Will the Sustainable Development Goals address the links between poverty and the natural environment[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2018(34):43~47.
[12] Cheng X etal. Topic modelling of ecology, environment and poverty nexus:An integrated framework[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2018(267):1~14.
[13] Heger.M, Zens.G, Bangalor.M.Does the Environment Matter for Poverty Reduction? The Role of Soil Fertility and Vegetation Vigor in Poverty Reduction[J]. Policy Research Working Paper 8537.
[14] 刘子宁,郑伟,贾若,等.医疗保险、健康异质性与精准脱贫[J].金融研究,2019(5):56~74.
[15] Hlahla.S,Goebel.A.Green Economy:A Strategy to Alleviate Urban Poverty and Safeguard the Environment? KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa[J]. Urban Forum,2016(27):113~127.
[16] 杨丽雪,单德朋,苏永杰.生态环境、碳排放与贫困减缓:基于西部地区省级面板数据的实证研究[J].西南民族大学学报(社会科学版),2014(6):150~154.
[17] 程欣,帅传敏,王静,等.生态环境和灾害对贫困影响的研究综述[J].资源科学,2018(4):676~697.
[18] 祁毓,卢洪友.污染、健康与不平等:跨越"环境健康贫困"陷阱[J].管理世界,2015(9):32~51.
[19] 马奔,丁慧敏,温亚利.生物多样性保护对多维贫困的影响研究[J].农业技术经济,2017(4):116~128.
[20] 曾贤刚,秦颖."两山论"的发展模式及实践路径[J].教学与研究,2018(10):17~24.
[21] 周宗安,宿伟健,姜玉强.中国生态经济区带来了"金山银山与绿水青山"吗[J].财经科学,2018(2):87~98.
[22] 邹波,张彬,柴盈.我国连片特困区的绿色贫困问题研究[J].上海经济研究,2016(2):29~37.
[23] 李国景,陈永福.收入增长对营养需求的影响分析:来自广东省城镇住户的证据[J].经济科学,2017(3):60~72.
[24] 戴宏伟.对我国贫困地区"旅游脱贫"的思考:兼析美国的相关经验及启示[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2017(2):13~19.
[25] 万君,张琦.绿色减贫:贫困治理的路径与模式[J].中国农业大学学报(社会科学版),2017(5):79~86.