家族涉入调节下社会资本对企业创新的作用机制研究

贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2020 ›› Issue (05): 64-72.

家族涉入调节下社会资本对企业创新的作用机制研究

万里霜

北京交通大学, 北京 100044

收稿日期:2020-03-28 出版日期:2020-09-15 发布日期:2020-09-16
作者简介:万里霜(1972-),女,湖北孝感人,中国社会科学院博士,北京交通大学经济管理学院讲师,研究方向为会计、审计、内部控制和风险管理。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金项目"基于混合所有制改革动因的竞争性国企股权重组有效性研究"（17BGL074）。

Mechanism of impact of social capital on family firm innovation with the moderation of family involvement

WAN Li-shuang

Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China

Received:2020-03-28 Online:2020-09-15 Published:2020-09-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于社会资本相关研究的理论分析，重点探讨家族性社会资本与非家族性社会资本对企业创新的联合影响效应，以及这种联合效应是否强于家族性社会资本或非家族性社会资本个体效应。鉴于强大的控制联盟（即家族）的存在为组织环境中社会群体之间积极互惠影响创造了条件，还探讨了家族涉入在上述关系中的调节作用。运用偏最小二乘法（PLS）对318份调研问卷数据进行分析，结果表明：家族性社会资本与非家族性社会资本共同对家族企业创新产生积极影响，且联合影响效应优于家族性社会资本或非家族性社会资本的单一效应；家族控制对家族性社会资本和非家族性社会资本与企业创新的关系存在正向调节作用；代际参与对家族性社会资本和非家族性社会资本与企业创新的关系存在负向调节作用。

关键词: 家族性社会资本, 家族涉入, 企业创新, 家族控制, 代际参与

Abstract: This research focuses on the joint effect of family social capital and non-family social capital on family firm innovation, and whether this joint effect is stronger than the individual effect of family social capital or non-family social capital, based on the theoretical insights from social capital related research. suggesting that the presence of a strong dominant coalition (family) creates the conditions for a positive reciprocal influence between social communities within an organizational setting. Our study also highlights the moderating effect of family involvement in these relationships. This study uses partial least squares (PLS) modeling in order to analyze the data of 318 survey questionnaires. The results show that different forms of internal social capital have complementary effects on innovation, based on the general view of resource complementarity. Family social capital and non-family social capital have a positive impact on family firm innovation, and the joint effect is better than the single effect of family social capital or non-family social capital; Family control (family ownership and family management) moderates the relationship between family social capital/non-family social capital and family firm innovation, the highest level of innovation is achieved when family and non-family SC and family control are high; Generational involvement moderates the relationship between family social capital/non-family social capital and family firm innovation, the highest level of innovation is achieved when family and non-family SC are high, while generational involvement is low. The research conclusion provides useful experience for improving the effectiveness of relationships within family firms.

Key words: Family Social Capital, Family Involvement, Firm Innovation, Family control, Generational involvement

中图分类号:

F270

万里霜. 家族涉入调节下社会资本对企业创新的作用机制研究[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2020(05): 64-72.

WAN Li-shuang. Mechanism of impact of social capital on family firm innovation with the moderation of family involvement[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2020(05): 64-72.

参考文献

[1] Arregle J L, Hitt M A, Sirmon D G, et al. The Development of Organizational Social Capital:Attributes of Family Firms[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2007, 44(1):73~95.
[2] 李梓涵昕,朱桂龙.产学研合作中的主体差异性对知识转移的影响研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(2):320~328.
[3] 巩键,陈凌,王健茜,等.从众还是独具一格——中国家族企业战略趋同的实证研究[J].管理世界,2016(11):110~124;188.
[4] 董保宝,李全喜.竞争优势研究脉络梳理与整合研究框架构建——基于资源与能力视角[J].外国经济与管理,2013,35(3):2~11.
[5] 李永周,高楠鑫,易倩,等.创新网络嵌入与高技术企业研发人员创新绩效关系研究[J].管理科学,2018,31(2):3~19.
[6] 董保宝,王侃,周晓月.新创企业网络导向的测量与功效:基于中国经验的实证研究[J].管理学报,2016,13(5):631~639.
[7] 林春培,张振刚.过程视角下企业吸收能力组成与结构的实证研究[J].科研管理,2014,35(2):25~34.
[8] Pittino D, Visintin F, Lenger T, et al. Are High Performance Work Practices Really Necessary In Family Smes? An Analysis of the Impact on Employee Retention[J]. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2016, 7(2):75~89.
[9] 陈衍泰,夏敏,李欠强,等.创新生态系统研究:定性评价、中国情境与理论方向[J].研究与发展管理,2018,30(4):37~53.
[10] 高山行,周匀月,舒成利.企业的每种创新都生而平等吗——创新、企业绩效和竞争者联系的调节作用[J].科学学研究,2015,33(10):1564~1572;1583.
[11] 吕斐斐,邓艳斌,贺小刚.家族期望与创业坚持:参考点影响效应研究[J].南开管理评论,2017,20(5):41~55;68.
[12] Eisenberger R, Karagonlar G, Stinglhamber F, et al. Leader-Member Exchange and Affective Organizational Commitment:The Contribution of Supervisor's Organizational Embodiment[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2010, 95(6):1085~1103.
[13] Milgroma P, Roberts J. Complementarities and Fit Strategy, Structure, and Organizational Change in Manufacturing[J]. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1995, 19(2~3):179~208.
[14] 杨学儒, 李新春.家族涉入指数的构建与测量[J].中国工业经济, 2009(5):97~107.
[15] 严若森,叶云龙,江诗松.企业行为理论视角下的家族企业异质性、R&D投入与企业价值[J].管理学报,2016,13(10):1499~1508.
[16] 涂玉龙,陈春花.家族性、家族企业文化与家族企业绩效:机制与路径[J].科研管理,2016,37(8):103~112.
[17] 张京心,廖子华,谭劲松.民营企业创始人的离任权力交接与企业成长——基于美的集团的案例研究[J].中国工业经济,2017(10):174~192.
[18] Miller D, Minichilli A, Corbetta G. Is Family Leadership Always Beneficial?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013, 34(5):553~571.
[19] 刘学元,丁雯婧,赵先德.企业创新网络中关系强度、吸收能力与创新绩效的关系研究[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(1):30~42.
[20] 游家兴,邹雨菲.社会资本、多元化战略与公司业绩——基于企业家嵌入性网络的分析视角[J].南开管理评论,2014,17(5):91~101.
[21] Mazzola P, Sciascia S, Kellermanns F W. Non-Linear Effects of Family Sources of Power on performance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2013, 66(4):568~574.
[22] 陈士慧,吴炳德,巩键,等.家族凝聚力与战略先动性[J].科研管理,2016,37(5):94~102.
[23] Chin W W, Marcolin B L, Newsted P R. A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects:Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study[J]. Information Systems Research, 2003, 14(2):189~217.