贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2026 ›› Issue (05): 96-108.

• 乡村振兴 • 上一篇    

政治统合与科层规制:乡村治理中的包保责任制

佟健, 李小艺   

  1. 贵州财经大学 公共管理学院, 贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-17 发布日期:2026-09-17
  • 作者简介:佟健(1988—),男,贵州毕节人,管理学博士,贵州财经大学公共管理学院讲师,贵州绿色发展战略高端智库研究员,研究方向为乡村治理、基层党建和公共政策创新;李小艺(1989—),男,贵州桐梓人,政治学博士,贵州财经大学公共管理学院副教授,贵州绿色发展战略高端智库研究员,研究方向为乡村治理与中国政治研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金项目“党建引领县乡村‘三级联动’治理的实现机制与优化路径研究”(项目编号:23CSH004);贵州绿色发展战略高端智库成果。

Political Integration and Bureaucratic Regulation: The Responsibility System of Guarantee in Rural Governance

Tong Jian, Li Xiaoyi   

  1. College of Public Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China
  • Received:2025-12-17 Published:2026-09-17

摘要: 当前乡村社会普遍面临权责失衡、任务超载和程式化的治理困境,作为关键应对机制的“包保责任制”在实践中的有效性与可持续性亟待理论阐释。既有研究多侧重于其压力传导、目标管理或运动式动员的单一逻辑,未能系统揭示其内部“政治”与“行政”的复杂互动关系。为弥补此理论缺口,引入“政治统合—科层规制”的二维分析框架进行解析。研究发现,包保责任制的运作核心在于“政治统合”与“科层规制”的双轨协同与动态转化,前者通过政治势能驱动体制动员与结构再造,为科层治理注入动能;后者通过技术理性完成目标设定、过程控制与激励问责,为政治动能释放提供制度化通道。这一机制创新,形成了“政治创制科层、科层规制政治”的双向互构,旨在超越单纯的政治动员或行政包干,避免乡村治理陷入价值虚化或技术内卷的系统性困境,从而为理解中国特色基层治理韧性与国家治理现代化提供了新的理论视角。

关键词: 政治统合, 科层规制, 乡村治理, 包保责任制

Abstract: Rural society in China is currently grappling with governance dilemmas characterized by imbalances in power and responsibility, task overload, and procedural formalism. As a key coping mechanism, the “responsibility system of guarantee” urgently requires theoretical elucidation regarding its effectiveness and sustainability in practice. Existing studies tend to focus on a single logic—such as pressure transmission, target management, or campaign-style mobilization—and thus fail to systematically reveal the complex interactions between “politics” and “administration” embedded within the system. To fill this theoretical gap, this paper introduces a two-dimensional analytical framework of “political integration and bureaucratic regulation”. The study finds that the operational core of the responsibility system of guarantee lies in the dual-track coordination and dynamic transformation between political integration and bureaucratic regulation. The former drives systemic mobilization and structural reconstruction through political potential, injecting momentum into bureaucratic governance; the latter provides institutionalized channels for the release of political momentum by accomplishing goal setting, process control, and incentive accountability through technical rationality. This mechanism innovation constitutes a two-way mutual construction of “politics creating bureaucracy and bureaucracy regulating politics”, aiming to transcend simplistic political mobilization or administrative contracting, and to prevent rural governance from falling into systemic dilemmas of value depletion or technical involution. It thereby offers a new theoretical perspective for understanding the resilience of grassroots governance with Chinese characteristics and the modernization of state governance.

Key words: political integration, bureaucratic regulation, rural governance, responsibility system of guarantee

中图分类号: