贵州财经大学学报

›› 2018 ›› Issue (03): 1-13.

• 宏观经济 •    下一篇

中国货币政策的分配效应:一个开放经济的视角

陈利锋1,2,3, 雷盼盼1   

  1. 1. 中共广东省委党校 经济学教研部, 广东 广州 510053;
    2. 广东财经大学 国民经济研究中心, 广东 广州 510320;
    3. 中国社会科学院 经济研究所, 北京 100836
  • 收稿日期:2018-01-13 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-05-22
  • 作者简介:陈利锋(1982-),男,湖北黄冈人,经济学博士,中共广东省委党校副教授,研究方向为货币与金融经济学、劳动经济学;雷盼盼(1990-),女,河南开封人,中共广东省委党校硕士研究生,研究方向为货币与金融经济学。
  • 基金资助:

    国家社科基金重大项目"提高发展平衡性、包容性、可持续性的动力机制研究"（编号：15ZDC012）。

The Distribution Effects of China's Monetary Policy: An Open Economy Perspective

CHEN Li-feng1,2,3, LEI Pan-pan1   

  1. 1. Teaching and ResearchDepartment of Economics, Guangdong Provincial Party School of CPC, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510053, China;
    2. National Economic Research Center, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510320, China;
    3. Institute of Economics, China Academy of Social Science, Beijing 100836, China
  • Received:2018-01-13 Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-22

PDF

143

摘要： 在一个包含贸易部门与非贸易部门的开放经济NK-DSGE模型中，考察了货币政策的分配效应。研究发现，基准货币政策下，贸易部门积极的技术冲击对于不同类型家庭消费和实际工资具有不同的动态冲击效应，并且引起消费不平等与收入不平等的上升。在此基础上，政策评价的结果显示；（1）最优货币政策倾向于降低消费不平等与收入不平等；（2）严格盯住经济增长的货币政策在最大程度上导致了消费不平等与收入不平等的恶化，盯住名义汇率的货币政策则次之；（3）盯住实际汇率的货币政策对于消费不平等与收入不平等的影响与最优货币政策最为接近。因此，针对最小化货币政策分配效应所引致的不平等，货币政策应该对实际汇率做出反应。

关键词: 贸易部门, 非贸易部门, 分配效应, 消费不平等, 收入不平等

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a open economy NK-DSGE model with trade and nontrade sector, and investigate the distribution effects of China's monetary policy. The result shows that, consumption and real wage belongs to different household behaves differently, and consumption inequality and income inequality significantly upward when the positive technology shocks of trade sector shots the economy. Based on this, the result of policy evaluation argues that:(1)the optimal policy tends to decrease consumption inequality and income inequality;(2)if strict growth targeting policy implemented, consumption inequality and income inequality tends to the largest range of deterioration, and the nominal exchange rate targeting policy follows;(3)the impact of real exchange rate targeting policy on consumption inequality and income inequality is closer to optimal policy than other policy regime. Therefore, based on the perspective of the inequality that led by the distribution effect of monetary policy, monetary policy should respond to real exchange rate.

Key words: trade sector, non-trade sector, distribution effects, consumption inequality, income inequality

中图分类号: