中国货币政策的分配效应:一个开放经济的视角

›› 2018 ›› Issue (03): 1-13.

• 宏观经济 • 下一篇

中国货币政策的分配效应:一个开放经济的视角

陈利锋^1,2,3, 雷盼盼¹

1. 中共广东省委党校经济学教研部, 广东广州 510053;
2. 广东财经大学国民经济研究中心, 广东广州 510320;
3. 中国社会科学院经济研究所, 北京 100836

收稿日期:2018-01-13 出版日期:2018-05-15 发布日期:2018-05-22
作者简介:陈利锋(1982-),男,湖北黄冈人,经济学博士,中共广东省委党校副教授,研究方向为货币与金融经济学、劳动经济学;雷盼盼(1990-),女,河南开封人,中共广东省委党校硕士研究生,研究方向为货币与金融经济学。
基金资助:
国家社科基金重大项目"提高发展平衡性、包容性、可持续性的动力机制研究"（编号：15ZDC012）。

The Distribution Effects of China's Monetary Policy: An Open Economy Perspective

CHEN Li-feng^1,2,3, LEI Pan-pan¹

1. Teaching and ResearchDepartment of Economics, Guangdong Provincial Party School of CPC, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510053, China;
2. National Economic Research Center, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510320, China;
3. Institute of Economics, China Academy of Social Science, Beijing 100836, China

Received:2018-01-13 Online:2018-05-15 Published:2018-05-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在一个包含贸易部门与非贸易部门的开放经济NK-DSGE模型中，考察了货币政策的分配效应。研究发现，基准货币政策下，贸易部门积极的技术冲击对于不同类型家庭消费和实际工资具有不同的动态冲击效应，并且引起消费不平等与收入不平等的上升。在此基础上，政策评价的结果显示；（1）最优货币政策倾向于降低消费不平等与收入不平等；（2）严格盯住经济增长的货币政策在最大程度上导致了消费不平等与收入不平等的恶化，盯住名义汇率的货币政策则次之；（3）盯住实际汇率的货币政策对于消费不平等与收入不平等的影响与最优货币政策最为接近。因此，针对最小化货币政策分配效应所引致的不平等，货币政策应该对实际汇率做出反应。

关键词: 贸易部门, 非贸易部门, 分配效应, 消费不平等, 收入不平等

Abstract: In this paper, we consider a open economy NK-DSGE model with trade and nontrade sector, and investigate the distribution effects of China's monetary policy. The result shows that, consumption and real wage belongs to different household behaves differently, and consumption inequality and income inequality significantly upward when the positive technology shocks of trade sector shots the economy. Based on this, the result of policy evaluation argues that:(1)the optimal policy tends to decrease consumption inequality and income inequality;(2)if strict growth targeting policy implemented, consumption inequality and income inequality tends to the largest range of deterioration, and the nominal exchange rate targeting policy follows;(3)the impact of real exchange rate targeting policy on consumption inequality and income inequality is closer to optimal policy than other policy regime. Therefore, based on the perspective of the inequality that led by the distribution effect of monetary policy, monetary policy should respond to real exchange rate.

Key words: trade sector, non-trade sector, distribution effects, consumption inequality, income inequality

中图分类号:

F820

陈利锋, 雷盼盼. 中国货币政策的分配效应:一个开放经济的视角[J]. , 2018(03): 1-13.

CHEN Li-feng, LEI Pan-pan. The Distribution Effects of China's Monetary Policy: An Open Economy Perspective[J]. , 2018(03): 1-13.

参考文献

[1] Blanchard O.,Giovanni D.,Mauro P.Rethinking Macro Policy:Getting Granular[R].IMF Staff Discussing Papers,2013,No.13/003.

[2] Kanbur R.,Stiglitz J.Dynastic Inequality,Mobility and Equality of Opportunity[J].The Journal of Inequality,2016,14(4):419-434.

[3] Blanchard O.,Portugal P.Booms,Slump,Sudden Stops,Recovery,and Policy Options:Portugal and Euro[R].Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Papers,2017,No.WP17-8.

[4] Sterk V.,Tenreyro S.The Transmission of Monetary Policy through Redistributions and Durable Purchase[R].CEPR Discussing Papers,2015,No.10785.

[5] Prasad E.Distribution Effects of Macroeconomic Policy Choices in Emerging Market Economies[J].IMF Economic Review,2014,62(3):409-429.

[6] Prasad E.,Zhang B.Distribution Effects of Monetary Policy in Emerging Market Economies[R].NBER Working Papers,2015,No.w21471.

[7] Doepke M.,Schneider M.,Selezneva V.Distribution Effects of Monetary Policy[R].Society for Economic Dynamics 2015 Meeting Papers,2015,No.1099.

[8] Auclert A.Monetary Policy and the Redistribution Channel[R].Department of Economics Working Papers of Stanford University,2017,No.2017-5.

[9] 康立,龚六堂.金融摩擦、银行净资产与国际经济危机传导——基于多部门DSGE模型分析[J].经济研究,2014(5):147-159.

[10] 朱振,王行鹏.论货币政策调控的分配效应——基于拉姆齐模型对我国居民财富运用策略的解释[J].金融与经济,2009(7):20-22.

[11] 陆磊.项目投资的再分配效应及其改革[J].南方金融,2010(3):4-5.

[12] 闫泽涛,李燃.国民收入分配的外部性问题研究[J].经济与管理评论,2017(5):21-27.

[13] 徐明东,陈学斌.中国国际收支顺差的流动性分配效应与银行贷款渠道检验[J].世界经济,2011(8):112-133.

[14] 陈利锋.收入不平等与货币政策:基于异质性家庭的视角——货币政策盯住目标应该纳入收入不平等吗?[J].西部论坛,2018(1):18-28.

[15] 中国人民银行海口中心支行课题组.货币政策冲击的收入分配效应研究[J].南方金融,2014(12):17-24.

[16] 张伟进,方振瑞,黄敬翔.城乡居民社火水平差距的变化——基于经济周期视角分析[J].经济学(季刊),2015(2):651-676.

[17] 何东,张文朗,韩高峰,胡东安.中国非贸易部门的生产率增长[J].金融研究,2012(10):15-28.

[18] 胡佩.国际贸易及产业结构调整对我国非贸易部门与贸易部门工资差距的影响分析[J].对外经贸,2016(2):15-18.

[19] Galí J.,López-Salido J.D.,Valles J.Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption[J].Journal of the European Economics Association,2007,5(1):227-270.

[20] Christiano L.,Eichenbaum M.,Trabandt M.Unemployment and Business Cycle[J].Econometrica,2016,84(7):153-1569.

[21] 宿玉海,姜明磊,刘海莹.短期资本流动、人民币国际化与汇率变动关系研究[J].经济与管理评论,2018(2):109-118.

[22] Gal1' J.,Monacelli T.Understanding the Gains from Wage Flexibility:The Exchange Rate Connection[J].American Economic Review,2016,106(12):3829-3868.

[23] Gal1' J.Monetary Policy,Inflation and the Business Cycle:An Introduction to the New Keynesian Framework[M].Princeton:Princeton Univerity Press,2015,2nd Edition.

[24] 朱军.债权压力下财政政策与货币政策的动态互动效应——一个开放经济的DSGE模型[J].财贸经济,2016(6):5-17.

[25] He D.,Yu X.Network Effects in Currency Internationalisation:Insights from BIS Triennial Surveys and Implications for Renminbi[J].Journal of International Money and Finance,2016,68(C):203-229.

[26] 王刚贞,张卓成.人民币汇率对就业的影响路径及实证研究[J].金融与经济,2013(2):14-18.

[27] 黄志刚,郭桂霞.资本账户开放与利率市场化次序对宏观经济稳定性的影响[J].世界经济,2016(9):3-27.

[28] 陈利锋.消息、房地产价格与货币政策[J].当代财经,2017(6):25-33.

[29] Liu Z.,Phaneuf L.The Transmission of Productivity Shocks:What do We Learn about DSGE Modeling?[J].Annals of Economics and Statistics,2013,109/110:283-304.

[30] Basu S.,Fernald J.,Liu Z.Technology Shocks in a Two Sector DSGE Model[R].Society of Economic Dynamics 2012 Meeting Papers,2013,No.1017.

[31] Auclert A.,Rognlie M.Inequality and Aggregate Demand[R].NBER Working Papers,2017,No.w23541.

[32] Lambertini L.,Mendicino C.,Punzi M.T.Expectations-Driven Cycles in the Housing Markets[J].Economic Modelling,2017,60(C):297-312.

[33] Lubik T.,Schorfheide F.Do Central Banks Respond to Exchange Rate Movement?A Structural Investigation[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,2007,54(4):1069-1087.

[34] Liu Z.,Spiegel M.M.Optimal Monetary Policy and Capital Account Restriction in a Small Open Economy[J].IMF Economic Review,2015,63(September):298-324.

[35] Frommel M.,Garo G.,Franizisha S.Monetary Policy Rules in Central and Eastern European Countries:Does the Exchange Rate Matter?[J].Journal of Macroeconomics,2011,33(4):807-818.

[36] Aizenman J.,Hutchison M.,Noy I.Inflation Targeting and Real Exchange Rate in Emerging Markets[J].World Development,2011,39(5):712-724.

[37] Burstein A.,Gopinath G.International Prices and Exchange Rate[A].in Gopinath G.,Helpman E.,Rogoff K.eds.Handbook of International Economics,2014,4(A):391-451.

[38] Zhang Y.Unemployment Fluctuations in a Small Open-Economy Model with Segmented Labour Markets:The Case of Canada[R].Bank of Canada Working Paper,2013,No.2013-40.

[39] Christiano L.,Trabandt M.,Walentin K.Introducing Financial Frictions and Unemployment into a Small Open Economy Model[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2011,35(12):1999-2041.

[40] Christiano L.,Eichenbaum M.,Trabandt M.Understanding the Great Recession[J].American Economic Journal:Macroeconomics,2015,7(1):110-167.

[41] Ahn S.,Kaplan G.,Moll B.When Inequality Matters for Macro and Macro Matters for Inequality[R].NBER Working Papers,2017,No.w23494.

中国货币政策的分配效应:一个开放经济的视角

The Distribution Effects of China's Monetary Policy: An Open Economy Perspective

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	蔡昌, 林淼. 房地产税的财富再分配效应研究——基于家庭规模与财产口径视角[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2020, 38(04): 11-17.
[2]	寇　竞，胡永健. 城镇劳动者个人和家庭因素对工作贫困的影响分析[J]. , 2014, 32(06): 90-.