经济环境、政府补贴与企业发展——基于生存分析方法的实证研究

›› 2019 ›› Issue (05): 35-43.

经济环境、政府补贴与企业发展——基于生存分析方法的实证研究

李强

安徽科技学院财经学院, 安徽蚌埠 233100

收稿日期:2018-03-20 出版日期:2019-09-15 发布日期:2019-09-20
作者简介:李强(1981-),男,山东滕州人,博士,安徽科技学院副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为经济结构调整。
基金资助:
安徽省社科基金面上项目"经济发展新常态下我国多元经济结构转型：理论重构与实证研究"（AHSKF2018D21）。

Economic Environment, Government Subsidies and Enterprise Development-an Empirical Study Based on Survival Analysis

LI Qiang

School of Finance Economics Anhui Science and Technology University, Bengbu, Anhui 233100, China

Received:2018-03-20 Online:2019-09-15 Published:2019-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过我国工业企业统计数据分析宏观经济的两个方面，提出宏观经济发展速度和宏观经济政策稳定性在政府补贴政策对企业生存发展影响的调节作用方面的理论假设，并利用生存分析方法对理论假设进行实证检验。理论和实证研究表明，政府补贴更愿意在宏观经济增长速度低的时期实施，但在宏观经济高速增长时期，政府补贴对企业生存概率的提升作用要明显高于低速增长时期。宏观经济政策不稳定性企业获得政府补贴的概率较大，并且在宏观经济政策不稳定时期加大企业的补贴力度相比政策稳定期能够更明显地促进企业的生存发展。

关键词: 宏观经济环境, 政府补贴, 企业发展

Abstract: The article obtains two aspects of macroeconomic environment through the statistical data analysis of China's industrial enterprises, the theoretical hypothesis that the macro-economic development speed and the macro-economic policy stability influence the government subsidy policy on the enterprise survival and development is obtained, Then we use the survival analysis method to test the theoretical hypothesis. Theoretical and empirical studies show that government subsidies are more willing to be implemented in the period of low macroeconomic growth, but in the period of high macroeconomic growth, the promotion effect of government subsidies on the survival probability of enterprises is significantly higher than that in the period of low macroeconomic growth. Enterprises with unstable macroeconomic policies are more likely to receive government subsidies, In addition, in the period of macroeconomic policy instability, increasing the subsidy intensity of enterprises can more obviously promote the survival and development of enterprises than in the period of policy stability.

Key words: economic environment, government subsidies, enterprise development

中图分类号:

F272

李强. 经济环境、政府补贴与企业发展——基于生存分析方法的实证研究[J]. , 2019(05): 35-43.

LI Qiang. Economic Environment, Government Subsidies and Enterprise Development-an Empirical Study Based on Survival Analysis[J]. , 2019(05): 35-43.

参考文献

[1] Koski H, Pajarinen M. Subsidies, the Shadow of Death and Labor Productivity[J]. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2015, 15(2):189-204.

[2] Espenlaub S, Goyal A, Mohamed A. Impact of Legal Institutions on IPO Survival:A Global Perspective[J]. Journal of Financial Stability, 2016, 25(3):98-112.

[3] Amezcua A S, Grimes M G, Bradley S W, Wiklund J. Organizational Sponsorship and Founding Environments:A Contingency View on the Survival of Business-incubated Firms, 1994-2007[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2013, 56(6):1628-1654.

[4] Box M. The Death of Firms:Exploring the Effects of Environment and Birth Cohort on Firm Survival in Sweden. Small Business Economics, 2008, 31(4):379-393.

[5] 刘尚希,武靖州.宏观经济政策目标应转向不确定性与风险——基于经济周期视角的思考[J].管理世界,2018(4):8-16.

[6] 刘贯春,张军,刘媛媛.金融资产配置、宏观经济环境与企业杠杆率[J].世界经济,2018(1):148-173.

[7] Baggs J, Beaulieu E, Fung L. Firm Survival, Performance, and the Exchange Rate[J]. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne Dêconomique, 2009, 42(2):393-421.

[8] Fogarty J J, Sagerer S. Exploration Externalities and Government Subsidies:The Return to Government[J]. Resources Policy, 2016, 47(2):78-86.

[9] Ejermo O. and Xiao J. Entrepreneurship and Survival over the Business Cycle:How do New Technology-based Firms Differ? Small Business Economics, 2014, 43(2):411-426.

[10] Geroski P A., Mata J. and Portugal P. Founding Conditions and the Survival of New Firms. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(5):510-529.

[11] Baker S. R., Bloom N. and Davis S J. Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2016, 131(4):1593-1636.

[12] 徐静,蔡萌,岳希明.政府补贴的收入再分配效应[J].中国社会科学,2018(1):39-58.

[13] 王昀,孙晓华.政府补贴驱动工业转型升级的作用机理[J].中国工业经济,2017(10):99-117.

[14] 张慧.政府补贴、异质性与企业生存:来自中国工业企业的证据[D].浙江大学,2018:157-168.

[15] 李强.产业政策、技术创新与企业出口绩效——基于不同产业集聚程度的分析[J].世界经济研究,2016(5):77-86.