贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2020 ›› Issue (02): 105-110.

• 贫困与发展 • 上一篇    

乡村振兴背景下深度贫困地区不同土地经营模式效益比较研究——以云南省迪庆藏区为例

马光选, 刘强   

  1. 云南行政学院, 云南 昆明 650111
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-19 出版日期:2020-03-15 发布日期:2020-03-24
  • 作者简介:马光选(1981-),男,陕西西安人,讲师,博士,研究方向为乡村社会与基层治理;刘强(1964-),男,重庆人,编审,博士,研究方向为乡村社会与基层治理。
  • 基金资助:
    2019年度全国地方党校(行政学院)重点调研课题"全域治理理念下云南沿边乡村"逆空心化"模式研究"(2019dfdxkt113);国家社科基金项目"中缅边境重大社会风险的跨域治理研究"(19BZZ062)。

Comparative Study on the Benefits of Different Land Management Models in Deeply Impoverished Areas under the Background of Rural Rejuvenation-Taking Diqing Tibetan Area of Yunnan Province as an example

MA Guang-xuan, LIU Qiang   

  1. Yun Nan Administration College, Kunming, Yunnan 650111, China
  • Received:2019-10-19 Online:2020-03-15 Published:2020-03-24

摘要: 基于农户经营意愿、资本投入情况和劳动力使用情况三个要素的考量,将现有的土地经营模式划分为市场化小农计划经营模式、资本密集型雇佣经营模式和劳动密集型联合经营模式等三种类型,对不同土地经营模式进行经济效益和社会效益的比较研究。结果表明:不管是从经济效益还是社会效益来进行判断,劳动密集型联合经营模式都是深度贫困地区农户收益最大化的土地经营模式。

关键词: 深度贫困, 土地经营模式, 效益比较

Abstract: Based on the consideration of three factors:farmers' willingness to operate, capital investment, and labor use, this paper divides the existing land management model into a market-based small-scale farmer plan management model, a capital-intensive employment management model, and a labor-intensive joint management model Types, A comparative study on economic and social benefits of different land management modes.Regardless of judging from the peasant household economic or social benefits maximization, the labor-intensive joint management model is the land management model with the highest peasant household income in the deeply impoverished areas of Diqing Prefecture.

Key words: deep poverty, land management model, benefit comparison

中图分类号: