技术还是制度:粤港澳大湾区公共服务合作瓶颈约束及路径创新

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 公共服务合作有利于提高粤港澳大湾区民生福利,有利于大湾区持续高质量发展。由于技术及制度原因,粤港澳大湾区公共服务合作仍存障碍,迟滞了大湾区一体化深度发展进程。研究发现,导致粤港澳大湾区公共服务合作不足,既有制度方面的无形约束,也有技术方面的有形约束,其中制度创新不足是根源。粤港澳大湾区应以创新公共服务合作机制为突破口,提高湾区内公共治理的技术能力,主要包括:夯实国家认同的公共价值、完善配套制度对接、建立公共服务民主决策机制、统一公共服务合作技术标准、优化公共服务合作技术手段等方面。研究成果的边际贡献在于同时将制度和技术置于湾区公共服务合作过程中,在制度多样性前提下,解构了技术一体化路径,进而精准性提出对策建议。

关键词: 粤港澳大湾区, 公共服务合作, 制度创新, 技术创新

Abstract: Public service cooperation is conducive to improving the livelihood and welfare of the Greater Bay Area of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao, and to the sustainable and high-quality development of the Greater Bay Area. Due to institutional and technical reasons, there are still obstacles in the public service cooperation in the Greater Bay Area of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao, which delays the in-depth development of the Greater Bay Area integration. The study finds that the lack of public service cooperation in the Greater Bay Area of Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao results from both intangible constraints in the system and tangible constraints in the technology, among which the lack of institutional innovation was the root cause of the problem. The Guangdong Hong Kong Macao Greater Bay Area adheres to the principle of "system breakthrough, technical assurance and first try", and takes innovation of public service cooperation mechanism as a breakthrough to improve the technical capacity of public governance in the Bay Area. It mainly includes consolidating the public values recognized by the state, improving the construction of relevant supporting systems, establishing a democratic decision-making mechanism for public service cooperation, unifying the technical standards and qualification standards for public service cooperation, and optimizing the technical means for public service cooperation. The marginal contribution of the research results lies in placing both institutions and technology in the process of public service cooperation in the Bay Area. Under the premise of institutional diversity, the path of technological integration is deconstructed, and countermeasures and suggestions are proposed with precision.

Key words: guangdong hong kong macao greater bay area, public service cooperation, system innovation, technological innovation

中图分类号:

F124.7
F812

伍文中, 李静. 技术还是制度:粤港澳大湾区公共服务合作瓶颈约束及路径创新[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2023(05): 22-30.

WU Wenzhong, LI Jing. Technology or system: bottleneck constraint and innovation path of public service cooperation in Guangdong Hong Kong Macao Greater Bay Area[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2023(05): 22-30.

参考文献

[1] 杨爱平,郑晓云.粤港澳大湾区建设中的非实体性治理单元及其运行机制[J].理论探讨,2022(4):75~82.
[2] 霍祎黎,宋玉祥,刘亭杉.促进粤港澳大湾区经济协调发展的路径研究[J].经济纵横,2021(1):90~96.
[3] 陈抗,Arye L.Hillman,顾清扬.财政集权与地方政府行为变化——从援助之手到攫取之手[J].经济学(季刊),2002(4):111~130.
[4] 竺乾威.新公共治理:新的治理模式?[J].中国行政管理,2016(7):132~139.
[5] Johannes Rincke. Yardstick competition and public sector innovation[J].International Tax and Public Finance,2009,16(3):337~361.
[6] Osborne S P, Strokosch K, Radnor Z. Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services[M]. 2018.
[7] Brandsen T,Honingh M. Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction:A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions[J].Public Administration Review,2016(3):427~435.
[8] 辛冲冲,陈志勇.财政分权、政府竞争与地方政府财政汲取能力——基于动态空间面板模型的实证分析[J].山西财经大学学报,2019,41(8):1~16.
[9] 张云翔.公共服务的共同生产:文献综述及其启示[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2018(5):31~45;126.
[10] 郭佳良.应对"棘手问题":公共价值管理范式的源起及其方法论特征[J].中国行政管理,2017(11):111~117.
[11] Emerson K,Nabatchi T. Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes:A Performance Matrix[J].Public Performance & Management Review,2015(4):717~747.
[12] Alford John. Co-Production,Interdependence and Publicness:Extending Public Service Dominant Logic[J].Public Management Review,2015(5):673~691.
[13] 梁玉芳.大数据驱动下公共服务供给网络变革的四个维度[J].理论探索,2022(1):107~113.
[14] 李春生.大数据驱动社区公共服务精准化:问题面向、运行机制及其技术逻辑[J].湖北社会科学,2021(6):41~48.
[15] 颜佳华,王张华.人工智能与公共管理者角色的重新定位[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,56(6):76~82.
[16] 唐秋伟,訾大丽.公共服务合作供给网络建构[J].北方工业大学学报,2018,30(1):121~127.
[17] 张骞文,刘延海.基于SNA的公共服务供给中群团组织合作新模式[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2017,19(3):64~71.
[18] 李响,陈斌."聚集信任"还是"扩散桥接"——基于长三角城际公共服务供给合作网络动态演进影响因素的实证研究[J].公共行政评论,2020,13(4):69~89;206.
[19] MOORE M. Public Value Accounting:Establishing the Philosophical Basis[J]. Public Administration Review, 2014(4):465~477.
[20] 王学军.合作生产中的公共价值失败及其治理[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2020,57(4):78~86.
[21] 刘丽杭,徐俊.公共服务合作生产如何创造公共价值——以C市帮乐帮互助养老服务项目为例[J].求实,2021(6):54~70;109.
[22] 余璐,戴祥玉.经济协调发展、区域合作共治与地方政府协同治理[J].湖北社会科学,2018(7):38~45.
[23] 赵星,王林辉.中国城市创新集聚空间演化特征及影响因素研究[J].经济学家,2020(9):75~84.
[24] 牟娟,齐英.政府协调合作与宏观经济振兴的内在关系分析[J].贵州财经大学学报,2019(4):13~22.
[25] 张树剑,黄卫平.新区域主义理论下粤港澳大湾区公共品供给的协同治理路径[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2020,37(1):42~49.
[26] 陈剑.基于国家主导的粤港澳大湾区公共治理融合:条件保障、现实困境与路径探析[J].广西社会科学,2021(1):18~24.
[27] 宋雅楠."双循环"新格局下"粤澳深度合作区"合作机制分析——以中葡平台为视角[J].港澳研究,2021(2):57~65;95.
[28] 赵辰霖,徐菁媛.粤港澳大湾区一体化下的粤港协同治理——基于三种合作形式的案例比较研究[J].公共行政评论,2020,13(2):58~75;195~196.
[29] 方木欢.分类对接与跨层协调:粤港澳大湾区区域治理的新模式[J].中国行政管理,2021(3):36~44.
[30] 汤学兵,韦开成.高新技术企业集聚与经济增长——以粤港澳大湾区为例[J].广西师范大学学报,2022(3):95~109.
[31] 陈广汉,任晓丽.粤港澳大湾区城市群产业集聚变动的经济效应分析[J].亚太经济,2021(2):143~152.
[32] 徐青.粤港澳大湾区产业链发展研究[J].亚太经济,2021(3):147~152.
[33] 伍文中,唐霏,李勤.从竞争走向合作:粤港澳大湾区财政行为的推进路径分析[J].贵州财经大学学报,2021(4):24~32.
[34] 李冬娜,关锋.粤港澳大湾区青少年中华文化认同机制初探[J].海南大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022(1):128~134.