贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2025 ›› Issue (02): 1-11.

• 青年财经论坛 •    

县域创新能力对提振新质生产力的影响机制研究

蒙昱竹, 郝振龙, 王雪   

  1. 贵州财经大学 应用经济学院, 贵州 贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-08 发布日期:2025-03-21
  • 作者简介:蒙昱竹(1989—),女,云南昆明人,贵州财经大学绿色金融与生态环保协同创新中心和人工智能与数字金融实验室副研究员,研究方向为区域经济与城乡问题;郝振龙(2000—),男,河南洛阳人,贵州财经大学硕士研究生,研究方向为区域经济与城乡问题;王雪(2000—),女,山东德州人,贵州财经大学硕士研究生,研究方向为区域经济与城乡问题。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金西部项目“助力缓解需求收缩的新型城镇化发展质量提升研究”(22XJY020)。

Research on the Impact Mechanism of County-level Innovation Capability on Boosting New-quality Productivity

MENG Yuzhu, HAO Zhenlong, WANG Xue   

  1. School of Applied Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, Guizhou 550025, China
  • Received:2024-01-08 Published:2025-03-21

摘要: 中国经济已进入新发展阶段,需要通过提升新质生产力水平来实现经济转型和升级,而创新能力在提振新质生产力方面发挥了重要作用。既有文献虽然探究了多种影响新质生产力的要素,但是鲜有研究从县域创新能力的视角出发探讨其对于新质生产力的影响。文章以贵州2011—2021年88个县域为对象,分别构建了县域创新能力和新质生产力的指标体系,采用实证分析的方法,研究县域创新能力对新质生产力的静态以及动态影响效应。结果表明:第一,贵州省内县域创新能力对新质生产力影响的直接效应和间接效应均显著为正;第二,这一效应的实现机理:升维生产力三要素——“劳动者、劳动对象、劳动资料”;第三,静态机制下,黔中城市群的县域创新能力直接效应显著为正,非黔中城市群的县域创新能力间接效应显著为负;第四,动态机制下县域创新能力进步指数对新质生产力进步指数影响的直接效应显著为正,间接效应不显著,且动态机制的异质性视角下得出的结论与县域总体样本一致。

关键词: 新质生产力, 县域创新能力, 静态机制, 动态机制

Abstract: China's economy has entered a new stage of development, necessitating the enhancement of new-quality productivity to achieve economic transformation and upgrading. Innovation capability plays a crucial role in boosting new-quality productivity. Although existing literature has explored various factors influencing new-quality productivity, there is a scarcity of research examining its impact from the perspective of county-level innovation capability. Taking 88 counties in Guizhou Province from 2011 to 2021 as the research objects, this paper constructs index systems for county-level innovation capability and new-quality productivity, respectively, and employs empirical analysis to study the static and dynamic impact effects of county-level innovation capability on new-quality productivity. The results indicate that: Firstly, the direct and indirect effects of county-level innovation capability in Guizhou on new-quality productivity are both significantly positive; Secondly, the mechanism of this effect involves upgrading the three elements of productivity – "laborers, labor objects, and means of labor"; Thirdly, under the static mechanism, the direct effect of county-level innovation capability in the Central Guizhou Urban Agglomeration is significantly positive, while the indirect effect of county-level innovation capability in non-Central Guizhou Urban Agglomeration is significantly negative; Fourthly, under the dynamic mechanism, the direct effect of the county-level innovation capability progress index on the new-quality productivity progress index is significantly positive, while the indirect effect is not significant. Moreover, the conclusions drawn from the perspective of heterogeneity in the dynamic mechanism are consistent with those of the overall county-level samples.

Key words: new-quality productivity, county-level innovation capability, static mechanism, dynamic mechanism

中图分类号: