贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2025 ›› Issue (02): 84-93.

• 工商管理 • 上一篇    

创新激励政策与企业双元创新——谁能突破探索式创新瓶颈

扈钰欣, 胡秋阳   

  1. 南开大学 经济学院, 天津 300071
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-16 发布日期:2025-03-21
  • 作者简介:扈钰欣(1998—),女,河南濮阳人,南开大学经济学院博士生,研究方向为产业政策、企业创新;胡秋阳(1969—),男,吉林长春人,博士,南开大学经济学院教授,研究方向为产业组织理论。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金“资金关联、资金供求与资金配置:宏观资金流视角的应用一般均衡模型构建及政策分析”(项目编号:71874090);国家社会科学基金重大项目“马克思主义视域下技术进步的动力、机制与政策研究”(项目编号:19DZA047)。

Innovation Incentives and Corporate Dual Innovation-Who can break the bottleneck of exploratory innovation?

HU Yuxin, HU Qiuyang   

  1. School of Economics, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
  • Received:2024-05-16 Published:2025-03-21

摘要: 政府创新补贴和研发费用加计扣除是鼓励企业开展探索式创新和开发式创新、提高我国基础创新能力的重要政策手段。现有研究多聚焦于政府创新补贴对企业双元创新的影响,少有对研发费用加计扣除政策效果的探究,更鲜有研究将两种政策纳入同一理论框架进行对比分析。文章利用2008—2022年A股上市公司的数据研究发现,由于政策机制设计的差异,政府创新补贴促进了企业的双元创新,而研发费用加计扣除仅促进了企业开发式创新,对探索式创新不存在激励作用,这一效果在非国有企业、东部地区企业、市场化程度较高地区的企业中更为显著。机制检验表明,市场竞争水平、管理者短视程度和融资约束为重要的中介渠道,两类政策对中介变量的影响存在差异性,进而造成对企业双元创新的不同影响。进一步分析发现,仅有政府创新补贴提高了企业的探索式创新偏好;多个大股东能够发挥公司治理功能,增强两类政策对企业双元创新的促进效果。

关键词: 政府创新补贴, 研发费用加计扣除, 探索式创新, 开发式创新, 政策机制设计, 公司治理

Abstract: Government innovation subsidies and additional deduction for R&D expenses are important policy instruments to encourage enterprises to carry out exploratory and developmental innovation and to improve China's basic innovation capacity. Existing studies have mostly focused on the impact of government innovation subsidies on enterprises' dual innovation, and few have explored the effect of the policy of adding deduction for R&D expenses and included the two policies in the comparative analysis of the same theoretical framework. Using the data of A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2022, this paper finds that due to the difference in the design of policy mechanism, government innovation subsidy promotes dual innovation of enterprises, while additional deduction for R&D expenses only promotes the developmental innovation of enterprises, and there is no incentive for exploratory innovation, and this effect is not found in non-state-owned enterprises, eastern region enterprises, and enterprises in regions with a higher degree of marketization are more significant. Mechanism tests show that the level of market competition, the degree of managerial myopia and financing constraints are important mediating channels, and there is a difference in the effects of the two types of policies on the mediating variables, which results in different impacts on firms' dual innovation. Further analysis reveals that government innovation subsidies alone increase firms' preference for exploratory innovation; multiple large shareholders can play a corporate governance function and enhance the effect of the two types of policies on firms' dual innovation promotion.

Key words: government innovation subsidies, additional deduction for R&D expenses, exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, policy mechanism design, corporate governance

中图分类号: