中国制造业碳排放脱钩效应及其分解研究——基于区域与行业层次双重视角

贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2024 ›› Issue (02): 81-90.

中国制造业碳排放脱钩效应及其分解研究——基于区域与行业层次双重视角

林伟文¹, 游建民^1,2, 张伟¹

1. 广州大学经济与统计学院, 广东广州 510006;
2. 贵州省社会科学院工业经济研究所, 贵州贵阳 550002

收稿日期:2023-09-08 出版日期:2024-03-15 发布日期:2024-03-20
作者简介:林伟文(1990—),男,广州大学经济与统计学院博士研究生,研究方向为绿色经济、产业经济;游建民(通讯作者)(1988—),男,广州大学经济与统计学院数学博士后,贵州省社会科学院工业经济研究所副研究员,研究方向为低碳经济、能源经济;张伟(1968—),男,广州大学经济与统计学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向为绿色经济、产业经济。
基金资助:
中国博士后科学基金项目"'双重错位锁定'困境下传统制造业的数字化破解与内涵式发展研究"(批准号:2023M730774);教育部人文社会科学研究项目"国家重大战略背景下城市群多重身份治理共生效应的内生机制及优化策略研究"(批准号:21YJA2H006);国家社会科学基金青年项目"传统制造业高端化低碳化发展的错位失衡与数字协同治理研究"(批准号:23CJY021)

Research on the Decoupling Effect of Carbon Emissions in China's Manufacturing Industry and Its Decomposition: A Dual Perspective of Regional and Industrial Levels

LIN Weiwen¹, YOU Jianmin^1,2, ZHANG Wei¹

1. School of Economics and Statistics, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 550006, China;
2. Research Institute of Industrial Economy, Guizhou Academy of Social Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou 550002, China

Received:2023-09-08 Online:2024-03-15 Published:2024-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： “双碳”战略背景下,推进碳排放脱钩是实现制造业高端化、绿色化的必然之举。在制造业碳排放脱钩研究方面,现有研究更多基于全国层面对制造业整体行业进行碳排放脱钩分析,缺乏分区域、分行业方面的研究,研究视角不够具体。文章从区域与行业层次双重视角出发,采用Tapio脱钩模型与LMDI、Kaya恒等式融合方法,考察中国制造业碳排放脱钩效应及其分解效应。研究发现:东、中、西部制造业的碳排放脱钩效应呈现出不同特征,在高质量发展阶段整体上要好于快速发展阶段;高端和低端制造业相比中端制造业更容易实现碳排放脱钩。此外,在脱钩效应分解方面,碳排放强度对东、中、西部制造业碳排放脱钩作用总体为正,产出规模为负,产业结构作用方向不明确。在行业层次视角上,产出规模、产业结构、碳排放强度等因素对中端制造业碳排放脱钩影响最为显著,其次是高端制造业,低端制造业受影响最小。这一研究结果为制定针对性的制造业降碳措施提供重要参考。

关键词: 制造业, 碳排放脱钩, 分解效应, 双重视角

Abstract: In the context of the 'dual carbon' strategy, promoting decoupling of carbon emissions is an essential step towards achieving high-end and green manufacturing. However, existing research on decoupling carbon emissions in the manufacturing industry mainly focuses on a national level analysis of the overall industry, lacking studies at regional and sectoral levels with insufficient specificity. This article takes a dual perspective from both regional and sectoral levels to examine the decoupling effects of carbon emissions in China's manufacturing industry using the Tapio decoupling model combined with LMDI and Kaya identity decomposition methods. The study finds that there are different characteristics regarding decoupling effects among manufacturing industries in eastern, central, and western regions. Overall better performance is observed during the stage of high-quality development compared to rapid development. High-end and low-end manufacturing sectors are more likely to achieve decoupling compared to mid-range manufacturing. Furthermore, factors such as output scale, industrial structure, and carbon intensity have significant impacts on their respective roles in achieving decoupling of carbon emissions at the sectoral level perspective; followed by high-end manufacturing sectors while low-end sectors are least affected.

Key words: manufacturing industry, carbon emissions decoupling, decomposition effects, dual perspective

中图分类号:

F426
X321

林伟文, 游建民, 张伟. 中国制造业碳排放脱钩效应及其分解研究——基于区域与行业层次双重视角[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2024(02): 81-90.

LIN Weiwen, YOU Jianmin, ZHANG Wei. Research on the Decoupling Effect of Carbon Emissions in China's Manufacturing Industry and Its Decomposition: A Dual Perspective of Regional and Industrial Levels[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2024(02): 81-90.

参考文献

[1] 郭克莎,宋杰.关于制造业高质量发展与经济稳增长的理论分析[J].社会科学战线,2021(8):36~46.
[2] 付华,李国平,朱婷.中国制造业行业碳排放:行业差异与驱动因素分解[J].改革,2021(5):38~52.
[3] 王山,余东华.数字经济的降碳效应与作用路径研究——基于中国制造业碳排放效率的经验考察[J/OL].科学学研究,1~14.
[4] Von Weizsäcker E.Erdpolitik.Ökologische Realpolitik an der Schwelle zum Jahrhundert der Umwelt. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft[J].1989(3):397~398.
[5] Zhang Z.Decoupling China's carbon emissions increase from economic growth:An economic analysis and policy implications[J]. World Development, 2000,(4):739~752.
[6] Grossman G M, Krueger A B.Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement[M]. National Bureau of economic research Cambridge,Mass.,USA.1991.
[7] Jalil A,Mahmud S F.Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions:A cointegration analysis for China[J].Energy Policy,2009(12):5167~5172.
[8] 李国志,李宗植.中国二氧化碳排放的区域差异和影响因素研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,(5):22~27.
[9] 郑丽琳,朱启贵.中国碳排放库兹涅茨曲线存在性研究[J].统计研究,2012(5):58~65.
[10] Tapio P.Towards a theory of decoupling:degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001[J].Transport policy,2005(2):137~151.
[11] 禹湘,陈楠,李曼琪.中国低碳试点城市的碳排放特征与碳减排路径研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020(7):1~9.
[12] 潘竟虎,张永年.中国能源碳足迹时空格局演化及脱钩效应[J].地理学报,2021(1):206~222.
[13] 韩梦瑶,刘卫东,谢漪甜,等.中国省域碳排放的区域差异及脱钩趋势演变[J].资源科学,2021(4):710~721.
[14] 齐亚伟.中国区域经济增长、碳排放的脱钩效应与重心转移轨迹分析[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2018(5):17~29.
[15] 彭佳雯,黄贤金,钟太洋,等.中国经济增长与能源碳排放的脱钩研究[J].资源科学,2011(4):626~633.
[16] 揭俐,王忠,余瑞祥.中国能源开采业碳排放脱钩效应情景模拟[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020(7):47~56.
[17] Zhang Y J,Da Y B.The decomposition of energy~related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 41:1255~1266.
[18] 刘博文,张贤,杨琳.基于LMDI的区域产业碳排放脱钩努力研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018(4):78~86.
[19] Gao C,Ge H,Lu Y,et al.Decoupling of provincial energy-related CO2 emissions from economic growth in China and its convergence from 1995 to 2017[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,297:126627.
[20] Wang Q,Jiang X,Ge S,et al.Is economic growth compatible with a reduction in CO2 emissions? Empirical analysis of the United States[J].Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2019,151:104443.
[21] 杨晓华,胡怡文.制造业碳排放和经济增长脱钩关系研究——基于速度和数量双重视角[J].生态经济,2021(4):13~18.
[22] 张明志,孙婷,李捷.中国制造2025的碳减排目标会实现吗[J].广东财经大学学报,2017(4):4~14;23.
[23] 梁云,郑亚琴.产业升级对环境库兹涅茨曲线的影响——基于中国省际面板数据的实证研究[J].经济问题探索,2014(6):74~79.
[24] 王欢芳,胡振华.中国制造行业发展与碳排放脱钩测度研究[J].科学学研究,2012(11):1671~1675.
[25] 徐盈之,徐康宁,胡永舜.中国制造业碳排放的驱动因素及脱钩效应[J].统计研究,2011(7):55~61.
[26] 马越越.低碳约束下的中国物流产业全要素生产率研究[D];东北财经大学,2014.
[27] 傅元海,叶祥松,王展祥.制造业结构优化的技术进步路径选择——基于动态面板的经验分析[J].中国工业经济,2014(9):78~90.
[28] 杨翔,李小平,周大川.中国制造业碳生产率的差异与收敛性研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015(12):3~20.
[29] 宋小宁,曹慧娟,刘梦宁.都市圈协同发展与企业异地投资:比较优势视角[J].统计研究,2023(8):86~95.