Welfare Effect of IPO Pricing Adjustment

Abstract

Abstract: Under market-oriented pricing mode, the adjustment of IPO pricing is a common phenomenon. Based on theoretical analysis and the samples of 348 IPO companies with market-oriented pricing from November 1, 2010 to April 27, 2012, this paper examines the impact of IPO pricing adjustment on participant welfare. It is found that the majority of IPO pricing tends to increase, and the welfare effects are as follows. Issuers earn higher financing revenue. Underwriters charge more commissions. Although the earnings are relatively reduced, institutional investors, strategic investors and successful applicants can still get higher welfare increase. Retail investors are the main body of speculation and suffer welfare losses, but the loss is not due to the adjustment of IPO pricing.

Key words: IPO, investor, IPO pricing adjustment, welfare effect

CLC Number:

F832.5

HUANG Shun-wu, WANG Chun-ming. Welfare Effect of IPO Pricing Adjustment[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2020(06): 38-46.

References

[1] Hanley K W. The underpricing of initial public offerings and the partial adjustment phenomenon[J]. Journal of financial economics, 1993(2):231~250.
[2] Derrien F. IPO pricing in "hot" market conditions:Who leaves money on the table[J].The Journal of Finance, 2005(1):487~521.
[3] Ljungqvist A, Nanda V, Singh R. Hot Markets, Investor Sentiment, and IPO Pricing[J]. The Journal of Business, 2006(4):1667~1702.
[4] Willenborg M, Wu B, Yang Y S. Issuer operating performance and IPO price formation[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2015(5):1109~1149.
[5] Chiang Y M, Lowry M, Qian Y. The Information Advantage of Underwriters in IPOs[R]. Working Paper, 2014(1):1~10.
[6] Boeh K K, Dunbar C. Underwriter deal pipeline and the pricing of IPOs[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2016(2):383~399.
[7] Bakke E, Leite T E, Thorburn K S, Partial Adjustment to Public Information in the Pricing of IPOs[J]. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2016(4):1~16.
[8] 李冬昕,李心丹,俞红海,等.询价机构报价中的意见分歧与IPO定价机制研究[J].经济研究,2014(7):151~164.
[9] 姜婷.新股询价配给规则与IPO价格形成的进化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学,2014(6):10~16.
[10] 邵新建,薛熠,江萍,等.投资者情绪、承销商定价与IPO新股回报率[J].金融研究,2013(4):127~141.
[11] 宋顺林,唐斯圆.投资者情绪、承销商行为与IPO定价——基于网下机构询价数据的实证分析[J].会计研究,2016(2):66~72.
[12] 郑凯,阮永平,何雨晴.询价对象间关系网络的IPO定价后果研究[J].管理科学学报,2017,20(7):57~67.
[13] 邵新建,王兴春,贾中正,等.投资银行——机构投资者关系、"捧场"与IPO中的利益问题[J].金融研究,2019(11):170~188.
[14] 周孝华,陈鹏程.锁定制度、投资者情绪与IPO定价:基于承销商视角的理论与数值分析[J].管理工程学报,2017(2):84~90.
[15] 牛枫,叶勇,陈效东.媒体报道与IPO公司股票发行定价研究——来自深圳中小板上市公司的经验证据[J].管理评论,2017,29(11):50~61.
[16] 汪昌云,武佳薇,孙艳梅,等.公司的媒体信息管理行为与IPO定价效率[J].管理世界,2015(1):118~128.
[17] 邵新建,洪俊杰,廖静池.中国新股发行中分析师合谋高估及其福利影响[J].经济研究,2018(6):82~96.
[18] 郑建明,白霄,赵文耀."制度绑定"还是"技术溢出"——外资参股承销商与IPO定价效率[J].会计研究,2018(6):62~69.
[19] 徐浩萍,施海娜,金彧昉.新股定价基础:历史业绩还是技术创新——基于中国创业板市场的研究[J].金融研究,2017(4):191~206.
[20] 高敬忠,杨朝.IPO制度改革、盈余管理与IPO定价效率[J].贵州财经大学学报,2020(1):21~36.
[21] 尹自永,王新宇.定价市场化时期的承销商IPO定价行为研究[J].求索,2016(4):107~111.
[22] 刘柏,琚涛.管理者过度自信表达与企业代理成本——基于中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J]. 湖北大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020(1):135~145.
[23] Lowry M, Officer M S, Schwert G W. The Variability of IPO Initial Returns[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2010(2):425~465.
[24] Song S, Tan J S, Yi Y. IPO initial returns in China:Underpricing or overvaluation[J]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2014(1):31~49.
[25] 贾春新,赵宇,孙萌,等.投资者有限关注与限售股解禁[J].金融研究,2010(11):108~122.
[26] 邵新建,巫和懋.中国IPO中的机构投资者配售、锁定制度研究[J].管理世界,2009(10):28~41.
[27] Miller E M. Risk, Uncertainty, and Divergence of Opinion[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1977(4):1151~1168.
[28] 张宗新,王海亮.投资者情绪、主观信念调整与市场波动[J].金融研究,2013(4):142~155.