Fiscal Pressure,Technological Innovation and Green Total Factor Productivity

Abstract

Abstract: The typical Chinese-style "pressure-type" finance in economic and social transition period has important influence on local innovation activities and green sustainable development.By using the panel data of 256 prefecture-level cities in China in 2004~2017,this paper empirically examines the influence of fiscal pressure on green total factor productivity and the transmission mechanism.The results of benchmark test show that fiscal pressure significantly inhibits the improvement of green total factor productivity,and technological innovation significantly promoted green total factor productivity; The intermediary effect test found that the financial pressure prevented the green total factor productivity by restraining the technological innovation; Further threshold effect test shows that the effect of technological innovation on green total factor productivity has a double threshold effect based on financial pressure.In the different threshold range of financial pressure,the promotion effect of technological innovation on green total factor productivity shows a significant step down.In the future,it is necessary to comprehensively improve the Chinese-style "pressure-type" financial incentive system,reasonably control the range of financial pressure,and help technological innovation to enhance urban green total factor productivity.

Key words: fiscal pressure, technological innovation, green total factor productivity, fiscal vertical imbalance

CLC Number:

F812.7
F205

ZHENG Wei, LU Yuan-quan. Fiscal Pressure,Technological Innovation and Green Total Factor Productivity[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2021(04): 101-110.

References

[1] 谢贞发,严瑾,李培.中国式"压力型"财政激励的财源增长效应——基于取消农业税改革的实证研究[J].管理世界,2017(12):46~60.
[2] 孙开,张磊.分权程度省级差异、财政压力与基本公共服务支出偏向——以地方政府间权责安排为视角[J].财贸经济,2019,40(8):18~32.
[3] 席鹏辉,梁若冰,谢贞发.税收分成调整、财政压力与工业污染[J].世界经济(10):172~194.
[4] 彭飞,董颖.取消农业税、财政压力与雾霾污染[J].产业经济研究,2019(2):114~126.
[5] 杜雯翠,张平淡.县级市生态环境治理的两维向度:增长压力与财政压力[J].改革,2017(8):133~142.
[6] 包国宪,关斌.财政压力会降低地方政府环境治理效率吗——一个被调节的中介模型[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(4):41~51.
[7] 詹新宇,苗真子.地方财政压力的经济发展质量效应——来自中国282个地级市面板数据的经验证据[J].财政研究,2019(6):57~71.
[8] 张帆.金融发展影响绿色全要素生产率的理论和实证研究[J].中国软科学,2017(9):154~167.
[9] 卞元超,宋凯艺,白俊红.双重分权、竞争激励与绿色全要素生产率提升[J].产业经济评论,2018(3):15~34.
[10] 黄庆华,胡江峰,陈习定.环境规制与绿色全要素生产率:两难还是双赢?[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(11):142~151.
[11] 朱文涛,吕成锐,顾乃华.OFDI、逆向技术溢出对绿色全要素生产率的影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(9):63~73.
[12] 谢贤君.要素市场扭曲如何影响绿色全要素生产率——基于地级市经验数据研究[J].财贸研究,2019(6):36~46.
[13] 张彰,郑艳茜,李玉姣.财政分权、政府行为与绿色全要素生产率的增长[J].财经论丛,2020(3):22~33.
[14] 张建伟.财政分权对绿色全要素生产率的影响[J].统计与决策,2019(17):170~172.
[15] 李斌,祁源,李倩.财政分权、FDI与绿色全要素生产率——基于面板数据动态GMM方法的实证检验[J].国际贸易问题,2016(7):119~129.
[16] 杜俊涛,陈雨,宋马林.财政分权、环境规制与绿色全要素生产率[J].科学决策,2017(9):65~92.
[17] 肖远飞,吴允.财政分权、环境规制与绿色全要素生产率——基于动态空间杜宾模型的实证分析[J].华东经济管理,2019(11):15~23.
[18] 田淑英,董玮,许文立.环保财政支出、政府环境偏好与政策效应——基于省际工业污染数据的实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2016(7):14~21.
[19] 鲁桐,党印.投资者保护、行政环境与技术创新[J].世界经济,2015(10):99~124.
[20] 唐未兵,伍敏敏.财政分权与资源配置效率关系研究进展[J].经济学动态,2017(4):124~134.
[21] 潘明明,谢荣见.科技创新驱动绿色生态效率空间分异探析——基于地区市场分割视角[J].软科学,2019,33(10):20~25.
[22] 任阳军,汪传旭,李伯棠.等.分权程度省级差异、财政压力与基本公共服务支出偏向——以地方政府权责安排为视角[J].财贸经济,2019(8):18~32.
[23] 郑威,陆远权.金融分权、地方官员激励与企业创新投入[J].研究与发展管理,2018,30(5):53~62.
[24] Fare R,Grosskopf,Pasurka C A.Environmental Production Functions and Environmental Directional Distance Functions[J].Energy,2007,32(7):1055~1066.
[25] Oh D H.A Global Malmquist-Luenberger Productivity Index[J].Journal of Productivity Analysis,2010,34(3):183~197.
[26] Eyraud L,Lusinyan L.Vertical Fiscal Imbalances and Fiscal Performance in Advanced Economies[J].Journal of Monetary Economics,2013,60(5):571~587.
[27] 储德银,迟淑娴.转移支付降低了中国式财政纵向失衡吗[J].财贸经济,2018,39(9):25~40.
[28] 阎川,雷婕.财政分权对产业集聚影响的实证分析[J].经济评论,2019(3):104~122.
[29] Furman J L,Porter M E,Stern S.The determinants of national innovative capacity[J].Research Policy,2002,(31):899~933.
[30] 张玉明,聂艳华,李凯.知识溢出对区域创新产出影响的实证分析——以高新技术产业为例[J].软科学,2009(7):99~102.
[31] Baron R,Kenny D.The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research:Conceptual,Strategic,and Statistical Considerations[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1986,51(6):117~31198.
[32] Hansen B.E.Threshold Effects in Non-Dynamic Panels:Estimation,Testing and Inference[J].Journal of Econometrics,1999,93(2):345~368.