Research on the Differences of Incentive Effect of Innovation Policy based on process - A Dual Perspective on Resource Based theory and Signal Theory

Abstract

Abstract: Using a longitudinal datasets of Chinese manufacturing firms (2011~2013), this paper divide innovation policies into R&D subsidies、R&D deduction policy、high-tech tax incentives policy according to the process of innovation (ex-ante、interim、ex-post) and assess whether innovation policies promote or inhibit innovation based on resource theory and signal theory. Further, This paper further analyses the incentive differences between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises in terms of resource acquisition and resource utilization. The research shows that the tax incentives have greater incentives for corporate innovation than R&D subsidies. Compared with state-owned enterprises, innovation policies have more obvious incentives for private enterprises' innovation performance. Further, for state-owned enterprises, R&D subsidies are only a short-term incentive for innovation, while two types of tax incentives are more conducive to the medium- and long-term innovation performance of state-owned enterprises,. Therefore, the future policy adjustment should gradually strengthen the innovation policy that follows the market logic, and the focus is different for enterprises with different property rights.

Key words: R&D subsidies, tax incentives, innovation performance, ownership

CLC Number:

F273.1

PENG Yi-chen, CAI Jing-tao, PENG Ji-sheng. Research on the Differences of Incentive Effect of Innovation Policy based on process - A Dual Perspective on Resource Based theory and Signal Theory[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2022(06): 20-30.

References

[1] Aghion P, Cai J, Dewatripont M, et al. Industrial Policy and Competition[J]. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2015, 7(4): 1~32.
[2] 余明桂, 范蕊, 钟慧洁. 中国产业政策与企业技术创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2016(12): 5~22.
[3] 杨洋, 魏江, 罗来军. 谁在利用政府补贴进行创新?——所有制和要素市场扭曲的联合调节效应[J]. 管理世界, 2015(01): 75~86;98;188.
[4] 陈红, 张玉, 刘东霞. 政府补助、税收优惠与企业创新绩效——不同生命周期阶段的实证研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(3): 187~200
[5] Clausen T H. Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level?[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2009, 20(4): 239~253.
[6] Görg H, Strobl E. The effect of R&D subsidies on private R&D[J]. Economica, 2007, 74(294): 215~234.
[7] Yu F, Guo Y, Le-Nguyen K, et al. The impact of government subsidies and enterprises' R&D investment: A panel data study from renewable energy in China[J]. Energy Policy, 2016, 89: 106~113.
[8] 杨国超, 刘静, 廉鹏, 等. 减税激励、研发操纵与研发绩效[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(8): 110~124.
[9] 毛其淋, 许家云. 政府补贴对企业新产品创新的影响——基于补贴强度"适度区间"的视角[J]. 中国工业经济, 2015(6): 94~107.
[10] 白旭云, 王砚羽, 苏欣. 研发补贴还是税收激励——政府干预对企业创新绩效和创新质量的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(6): 9~18.
[11] 吴伟伟, 张天一. 非研发补贴与研发补贴对新创企业创新产出的非对称影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(3): 137~160;10.
[12] 陈红, 纳超洪, 雨田木子,等. 内部控制与研发补贴绩效研究[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(12): 149~164.
[13] Hall B, Van Reenen J. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(4~5): 449~469.
[14] 吴延兵. 不同所有制企业技术创新能力考察[J]. 产业经济研究, 2014(2): 53~64.
[15] 鞠晓生, 卢荻, 虞义华. 融资约束、营运资本管理与企业创新可持续性[J]. 经济研究, 2013, 48(1): 4~16.
[16] 孟庆玺, 尹兴强, 白俊. 产业政策扶持激励了企业创新吗?——基于"五年规划"变更的自然实验[J]. 南方经济, 2016(12): 1~25.
[17] 刘惠好,焦文妞.银行业竞争、融资约束与企业创新投入——基于实体企业金融化的视角[J].山西财经大学学报,2021(10):56-67.
[18] 陈丽姗,傅元海,黄国宾.研发补贴与企业全要素生产率[J].江西财经大学学报,2021(4):51~63.
[19] Kleer R. Government R&D subsidies as a signal for private investors[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(10): 1361~1374.
[20] 李田,杜阳.市场驱动、创新效率与企业风险承担——兼议"有为政府"的实现路径[J].江西财经大学学报,2020(6):32~45.
[21] 贺俊. 产业政策批判之再批判与"设计得当"的产业政策[J]. 学习与探索, 2017(1): 89~96;175.
[22] 何涌.R＆D投入能促进企业创新质量的提升吗？——基于风险投资的调节作用[J].经济经纬,2019,36(4):118~125.
[23] Zhou K Z, Gao G Y, Zhao H. State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2017, 62(2): 375~404.
[24] 杨晓妹,刘文龙,王有兴.政府创新补贴与企业技术创新——兼论补贴合理区间[J].财贸研究,2021(10):70~83.
[25] 王彦超, 李玲, 王彪华. 税收优惠与财政补贴能有效促进企业创新吗?——基于所有制与行业特征差异的实证研究[J]. 税务研究, 2019(6): 92~98.
[26] David P A, Hall B H, Toole A A. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence[J]. Research policy, 2000, 29(4~5): 497~529.
[27] Rao N. Do tax credits stimulate R&D spending? The effect of the R&D tax credit in its first decade[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2016, 140: 1~12.
[28] 郭玥. 政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(9): 98~116.
[29] Jourdan J, Kivleniece I. Too Much of a Good Thing? The Dual Effect of Public Sponsorship on Organizational Performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2017, 60(1): 55~77.
[30] Powell B. State Development Planning: Did it Create an East Asian Miracle?[J]. The Review of Austrian Economics, 2005, 18(3): 305~323.
[31] 周煜皓. 我国企业创新融资约束结构性特征的表现、成因及治理研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017(4): 184~185.
[32] 黎文靖, 李耀淘. 产业政策激励了公司投资吗[J]. 中国工业经济, 2014(5): 122~134.
[33] 余明桂, 潘红波. 政治关系、制度环境与民营企业银行贷款[J]. 管理世界, 2008(8): 9~21.
[34] 孙晓华, 郭旭, 王昀. 政府补贴、所有权性质与企业研发决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(6): 18~31.
[35] Schedler A, Diamond L J, Plattner M F. The self-restraining state: power and accountability in new democracies[M]. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999.
[36] 李莉, 于嘉懿, 赵梅,等. 管理防御视角下的国企创新——基于国企高管"作为""不作为"的探讨[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(3): 106~121.
[37] Aghion P, Bergeaud A, Lequien M, et al. The Impact of Exports on Innovation: Theory and Evidence[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2018.
[38] 周燕, 潘遥. 财政补贴与税收减免——交易费用视角下的新能源汽车产业政策分析[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(10): 133~149.