绿色差异化产品的定价与绿色度决策研究

›› 2018 ›› Issue (02): 98-110.

• 绿色发展论坛 • 上一篇

绿色差异化产品的定价与绿色度决策研究

柳键¹, 周辉^1,2

1. 江西财经大学信息管理学院, 江西南昌 330032/330013;
2. 江西财经大学现代经济管理学院, 江西南昌 330032/330013

收稿日期:2017-06-05 出版日期:2018-03-15 发布日期:2018-03-26
作者简介:柳键(1964-),男,湖南浏阳人,江西财经大学信息管理学院教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为运营与供应链管理;周辉(1981-),男,河南南阳人,江西财经大学现代经济管理学院讲师,博士研究生,研究方向为运营与供应链管理。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（71761015，71461009）；江西省社会科学规划项目（15GL12）；江西省教育厅科学技术研究项目（GJJ150475）；江西省研究生创新专项资金项目（YC2016-B063）。

Pricing and green degree decisions of green differentiated products

LIU Jian¹, ZHOU Hui^1,2

1. School of Information Technology Nanchang, China, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330032/330013, China;
2. Modern Economics & Management College, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330032/330013, China

Received:2017-06-05 Online:2018-03-15 Published:2018-03-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑消费者环境意识和绿色生产成本等因素的影响，在完全覆盖的双寡头垄断市场背景下，基于博弈分析方法研究绿色差异化产品的定价与绿色度决策。分析厂商的行动顺序、消费者环境意识和绿色生产成本的变化对产品绿色度、价格、市场份额与利润的影响。研究表明，从低绿色度厂商的角度看，自身先动情形最有利；从高绿色度厂商的角度看，同时行动情形最有利；从政府和消费者的角度看，低绿色度厂商先行情形下产品整体绿色度最高、价格绿色度比较低，此情形对政府和消费者均最有利。随着消费者环境意识的增强、绿色生产成本的降低，两家厂商选择的产品绿色度及其差异、两种产品价格、两家厂商利润均增加。

关键词: 绿色差异化, 绿色度, 环境意识, 定价, 双寡头垄断市场

Abstract: Taking consumers' environmental awareness and greening production technology into consideration, pricing mechanisms and green degree decisions of green differentiated products were discussed in the context of a covered duopoly market. Based on game theory, the influence of manufacturers' action order, consumers' environmental awareness and greening production technology on the green degree, prices, market shares and profits were analyzed. The result shows that, it is dominant for lower green manufacturer to act first, higher green manufacturer to act simultaneous. When lower green manufacturer moves first, the whole green level is highest and the ratio of price to green degree is lower, which is the best to government and consumers. With the enhancement of consumers' environmental awareness and the reduction of the greening cost, the product green degree and the difference between the two products, the price of the two products and the profit of the two manufacturers have increased.

Key words: green differentiation, green degree, environmental awareness, pricing, duopoly

中图分类号:

F272.3

柳键, 周辉. 绿色差异化产品的定价与绿色度决策研究[J]. , 2018(02): 98-110.

LIU Jian, ZHOU Hui. Pricing and green degree decisions of green differentiated products[J]. , 2018(02): 98-110.

参考文献

[1] DANGELICO R M,PONTRANDOLFO P.From green product definitions and classifications to the green option matrix[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2010,18(16):1608-1628.

[2] KANCHANAPIBUL M,LACKA E,WANG X,et al.An empirical investigation of green purchase behaviour among the young generation[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2014,66(3):528-536.

[3] LAI CKM,CHENG EWL.Green purchase behavior of undergraduate students in Hong Kong[J].The Social Science Journal,2016,53(1):67-76.

[4] LIOBIKIENE G,MANDRAVICKAITE J,BERNATONIENE J.Theory of planned behavior approach to understand the green purchasing behavior in the EU:a cross-cultural study[J].Ecological Economics,2016,125(c):38-46.

[5] ROBERTO R.Environmental product differentiation and environmental awareness[J].Environmental & Resource Economics,2007,36(2):237-254.

[6] YAKITA A,YAMAUCHI H.Environmental awareness and environmental R&D spillovers in differentiated duopoly[J].Research in Economics,2011,65(3):137-143.

[7] TIROLE J.The theory of industrial organization[M].Cambridge:MIT press,1988.

[8] GABSZEWUCZ J,THISSE J F.Price competition,quality and income disparities[J].Journal of Economic Theory,1979,(20):340-359.

[9] SHAKED,A,SUTTON J.Relaxing price competition through product differentiation[J].The Review of Economic Studies,1982,49(1):3-13.

[10] WAUTHY X.Quality choice in models of vertical differentiation[J].The Journal of Industrial Economics,1996,44(3):345-353.

[11] 向东,张保根,汪永超,等.绿色产品及其评价指标体系研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,1999,5(4):14-19.

[12] 向东,段广洪,汪劲松,等.基于产品系统的产品绿色度综合评价[J].计算机集成制造系统,2001,7(8):12-16.

[13] 柳键,周辉.考虑产品生命周期全过程的产品绿色度综合评价[J].科技管理研究,2016,36(19):60-63.

[14] 张雪平,殷国富.基于层次灰色关联的产品绿色度评价研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2005,25(17):78-82.

[15] 曹柬,吴晓波,周根贵.基于产品效用异质性的绿色供应链协调策略[J].计算机集成制造系统,2011,17(6):1279-1286.

[16] BERNHEIM B D.A Theory of conformity[J].Journal of Political Economy,1994,105(2):841-877.

[17] CONRAD K.Price competition and product differentiation when consumers care for the environment[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,2005,31(1):1-19.

[18] 孙良峰,裘乐淼,张树有,等.基于泛逻辑推理的复杂产品融合绿色性分析的设计方案评价技术[J].计算机集成制造系统,2013,19(8):1990-1999.

[19] 穆昕,王浣尘,李雷鸣.基于差异化策略的环境管理与企业竞争力研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):26-31.

[20] 申亮.基于委托代理理论的绿色产品定价问题研究[J].财贸经济,2008(5):112-115.

[21] Ghosh D,SHAH J.Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2015,164:319-329.

绿色差异化产品的定价与绿色度决策研究

Pricing and green degree decisions of green differentiated products

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘丹, 潘明颖, 王元芳. 金融中介声誉与资产证券化的定价研究[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2021, 39(01): 86-94.
[2]	黄顺武, 王春明. IPO定价调整的福利效应[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2020, 38(06): 38-46.
[3]	高敬忠, 杨朝. IPO制度改革、盈余管理与IPO定价效率[J]. 贵州财经大学学报, 2020, 38(01): 21-36.
[4]	王　博. 投资者情绪与股票市场定价效率实证研究[J]. , 2014, 32(04): 39-.
[5]	张　宁. 大数据背景下寿险产品定价与创新 [J]. , 2014, 32(02): 36-.
[6]	牛　拥，毛德勇. 人民币升值对中国制造业出口竞争力的影响[J]. , 2013, 31(06): 22-.
[7]	郑晓亚，肖　莹. 股权风险溢价理论研究综述———以Ｃ－ＣＡＰＭ模型为主线[J]. , 2013, 31(06): 42-.
[8]	何志刚，刘　萌. 股指期货定价误差的均值回复性动因与信息传递———基于异质投资者假设的实证研究[J]. , 2013, 31(02): 1-.
[9]	夏芳. 股票错误定价的分层分析———信息不对称与行为财务理论的联合解释[J]. , 2012, 30(4): 58-.