贵州财经大学学报

贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2025 ›› Issue (03): 49-58.

• 乡村振兴 • 上一篇    

中国数字乡村政策LDA量化分析——基于政策工具与动力视角的二维分析框架

邓崧, 龚伟   

  1. 云南大学 政府管理学院, 云南 昆明 650500
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-02 发布日期:2025-05-21
  • 作者简介:邓崧(1974—),男,四川中江人,云南大学政府管理学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向为数字治理与公共管理方法;龚伟(1990—),男,云南昆明人,云南大学政府管理学院博士研究生,研究方向为数字治理。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社科基金重点项目"新时代数字强边研究:基础理论、战略逻辑、模型建构与管理实践"(22FGLA001);云南省哲学社会科学规划项目"'数字悬浮’视角下云南省基层数字治理困境与破解路径研究"(QN202429);云南大学哲学社会科学创新团队项目"数字政府及其在边疆治理现代化中的实践"(CY2262420227)。

LDA quantitative analysis of China's digital rural policy -A two-dimensional analysis framework based on the perspective of policy tools and dynamics

DENG Song, GONG Wei   

  1. School of Government, Yunnan University, Kunming, Yunnan 650500, China
  • Received:2023-08-02 Published:2025-05-21

PDF

4

摘要： 探寻当前中国数字乡村建设政策工具使用的情况与内在特征,对优化未来我国数字乡村建设政策体系意义重大,然而基于全国大样本数字乡村政策的系统性分析及地区差异化研究的文献还相对缺乏。文章依据政策工具理论和新内源式发展理论构建数字乡村政策二维分析框架,结合运用LDA法对2018—2023年国家及省级政府发布的162份相关政策文本进行量化分析。结果表明:在基本政策工具维度中偏好使用策略性措施工具,供给型和需求型政策有效供给不足。在数字乡村建设动力维度中政府对于农民参与的重视力度最大,而对于城乡融合中公共服务均等化的政策供给不足。进一步研究发现,地方政策共性显著,与国家顶层设计保持高度一致,但东、中、西部也表现出一些因地制宜的政策偏好。由此,应当打好"组合拳",为乡村织好政策保护网;加快"新基建",为乡村打牢数字新底座;培养"新农人",为乡村供应数字新血液。

关键词: 数字乡村, 新内源式发展理论, 政策工具, LDA

Abstract: Exploring the current usage and inherent characteristics of policy tools for digital village construction in China is of great significance for optimizing the future policy system of digital village construction in our country. However, there is still a relative lack of literature based on systematic analysis of large-scale national samples of digital village policies and research on regional differences. This article constructs a two-dimensional policy analysis framework for digital rural areas based on policy tool theory and new endogenous development theory and uses LDA method to quantitatively analyze 162 relevant policy texts nationwide from 2018 to 2023. The results show that: in the dimension of basic policy tools, strategic measures are preferred; in the dimension of driving force for digital rural construction, policy tools aimed at improving farmers' participation in digital rural areas are used more frequently, but the supply-side policies are not comprehensive enough, and the demand-side policies are obviously missing. Furthermore, the overall integrity, systematicness, and coordination of the policy system are insufficient. Based on the above conclusions, it is suggested that systematic analysis of digital rural policy texts should be carried out regularly in the process of digital rural construction to optimize the structure, continuously consolidate the digital foundation, advance at the right time, and continuously improve farmers' digital literacy to form a policy consensus.

Key words: digital village, new endogenous development theory, policy tool, LDA

中图分类号: