A Study on The Efficiency Evaluation of Technology Finance Development Based on PCA-DEA-Moran Index

Abstract

Abstract: through the construction of the scientific and technological financial efficiency evaluation model based on the combination of principal component analysis, enveloping data analysis and Moran index, the efficiency of science and technology finance in China is evaluated by using the scientific and technological financial input index and output index of 31 provinces (cities and autonomous regions) in 2015.It is found that the scientific and technological financial efficiency of most parts of the country is relatively low, while Beijing, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Guangdong and Tianjin have high efficiency in scientific and technological financial input-output, and the scientific and technological financial efficiency in each region shows an obvious regional unbalanced development trend. Further, according to the results of the empirical analysis, We should improve the overall efficiency and level of technology finance development from the innovation of scientific and technological financial products, the optimization of the investment channels of scientific and technological finance, the construction of the service platform of scientific and technological finance and the coordinated development of the scientific and technological financial regions.

Key words: technology tinance, efficiency evaluation, principal component analysis, envelope data analysis, moran index

CLC Number:

F224.7
F223

LONG Yun-fei, YANG Hui, ZHU Yan. A Study on The Efficiency Evaluation of Technology Finance Development Based on PCA-DEA-Moran Index[J]. , 2018(03): 54-63.

References

[1] Chouyuan K,CHIN M S.Financial innovations and en-dogenous growth[J].Applied Mechanics and Materials Journal,2006,12(3):146-149.

[2] Guan J,Chen K.Modeling macro-R&D production frontier performance:an application to Chinese province-level R&D[J].Scientometrics,2010,82(1):165-173.

[3] PH Hsu,X Tian,Y Xu.Financial development and innovation:Cross-country evidence[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2014,112(1):116-135.

[4] Keuschning Christian.Venture Capital Backed Growth[J].Journal of Economic Growth,2004,9(2):239-261.

[5] 岑猷辉.广州科技金融发展政策研究[D].华南理工大学,2015.

[6] 王芳.河南省科技金融结合的绩效评价及对策建议[J].问题探讨,2016(12):86-89.

[7] 韩威.基于DEA-Tobit模型的科技金融结合效率实证分析——以河南省为例[J].理论研究,2015,125(8):36-40.

[8] 沈虹.基于结构方程模型的地方政府支持科技金融发展差异性研究——以江苏省为例[J].科技进步与对策,2013(11):48-52.

[9] 杨卉芷,马鑫杰.科技金融对技术创新的影响及政策建议——基于灰色关联分析法[J].西部经济管理论坛,2013(1):44-47.

[10] 温瑶.科技金融投入对技术创新产出影响的研究[D].大连理工大学,2016.

[11] 徐玉莲.区域科技创新与科技金融协同发展模式与机制研究[D].哈尔滨理工大学,2012.

[12] 李瑞晶,李媛媛,金浩.区域科技金融投入与中小企业创新能力研究——来自中小板和创业板127家上市公司数据的经验证据[J].技术经济与管理研究,2017(2):124-128.

[13] 郑潇潇.四川科技创新的金融支持研究[D].四川农业大学,2016.

[14] 肖泽磊,韩顺法,易志高.我国科技金融创新体系的构建及实证研究——以武汉市为例[J].科技进步与对策,2011(9):6-11