Financial Subsidies,Advanced Stage of Industry Structure and the Production Efficiency of Private High-Tech Industries - An Empirical Study Based on the Durbin Model of Dynamic Space

Abstract

Abstract: The leading and leading role of private high-tech industries in production efficiency is conducive to the implementation of my country's innovation-driven strategy and the realization of high-quality economic growth.This paper uses the urban panel data of private high-tech industries from 2003 to 2013, and uses the dynamic spatial Dubin model to study the direct impact and spatial spillover effects of financial subsidies and advanced stage of industry structure on the production efficiency of private high-tech industries.The research conclusions show that: financial subsidies have a significant promotion effect on the total factor productivity and technical efficiency of private high-tech industries, but the impact on technological progress is not significant, and only has a significant positive spatial spillover effect on technical efficiency.Advanced stage of industry structure has a significant positive impact on all indicators of production efficiency, and also has a spatial spillover effect on production efficiency,and if there is a spatial spillover effect, the spatial spillover effect is much greater than the direct effect.

Key words: production efficiency, financial subsidies, advanced stage of industry structure, private high-tech industries

CLC Number:

HONG Xia, MEI De-ping. Financial Subsidies,Advanced Stage of Industry Structure and the Production Efficiency of Private High-Tech Industries - An Empirical Study Based on the Durbin Model of Dynamic Space[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2022(04): 11-21.

References

[1] Coelli,T.J.,Rao,D.S.P.,Christopher,J.,Donnell,O.,&Battese,G.E..An Introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis[M].Springer Publishers,2006.
[2] 张娜,杜俊涛.财税政策对高新技术企业创新效率的影响——基于交互作用的视角[J].税务研究,2019(12):47~53.
[3] 曾淑婉.财政支出对全要素生产率的空间溢出效应研究——基于中国省际数据的静态与空间计量分析[J].财经理论与实践,2013,34(1):72~76.
[4] Grossman,G.,Helpman,E..Innovation and Growth in the World Economy[M].Cambridge, MA:MIT Press,1991.
[5] Lucas,R.E..Making a Miracle[J].Econometrica,1993,61(2):251~272.
[6] Peneder,M..Structural Change and Aggregate Growth[J].Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 14,2002:427~448.
[7] 殷红,张龙,叶祥松.中国产业结构调整对全要素生产率的时变效应[J].世界经济,2020,43(1):122~142.
[8] 刘建国,张文忠.中国区域全要素生产率的空间溢出关联效应研究[J].地理科学,2014,34(5):522~530.
[9] 于斌斌.产业结构调整与生产率提升的经济增长效应——基于中国城市动态空间面板模型的分析[J].中国工业经济,2015(12):83~98.
[10] 张同斌,高铁梅.财税政策激励、高新技术产业发展与产业结构调整[J].经济研究,2012,47(5):58~70.
[11] 李健,徐海成.技术进步与我国产业结构调整关系的实证研究[J].软科学,2011,25(4):8~13;18.
[12] 罗雨泽,罗来军,陈衍泰.高新技术产业TFP由何而定?——基于微观数据的实证分析[J].管理世界,2016(2):8~18.
[13] 陈林.中国工业企业数据库的使用问题再探[J].经济评论,2018(6):140~153.
[14] 聂辉华,江艇,杨汝岱.中国工业企业数据库的使用现状和潜在问题[J].世界经济,2012,35(5):142~158.
[15] Pastor,J.T.,Lovell,C.K..A global Malmquist productivity index[J].Economics Letters,2005,88(2):266~271.
[16] 任曙明,孙飞.需求规模、异质性研发与生产率——基于ACF法的实证研究[J].财经研究,2014,40(8):42~56.
[17] Tobler,W.R..Cellular geography[J].Philosophy in geography.Springer, Dordrecht, 1979:379~386.
[18] Cliff,A.D.,Ord,J.K..Spatial Autocorrelation[M].Pion,1973.
[19] Anselin,L..Spatial Econometrics:Methods and Models[M].Kluwer Academic,1988.
[20] Baltagi,B.H.,Egger,P.,Pfaffermayr,M..A generalized spatial panel data model with random effects[J].Econometric Reviews,2009,32(5~6):650~685.
[21] LeSage,J.P..An introduction to spatial econometrics[J].Revue d'économie industrielle,2008(123):19~44.
[22] 白俊红,王钺,蒋伏心,李婧.研发要素流动、空间知识溢出与经济增长[J].经济研究,2017,52(7):109~123.
[23] 罗伟,葛顺奇.跨国公司进入与中国的自主研发:来自制造业企业的证据[J].世界经济,2015,38(12):29~53.
[24] 张先锋,陈琳,吴伟东.交通基础设施、人力资本分层集聚与区域全要素生产率——基于我国285个地级市面板数据的经验分析[J].工业技术经济,2016,35(6):92~102.
[25] 刘生龙,胡鞍钢.基础设施的外部性在中国的检验:1988~2007[J].经济研究,2010,45(3):4~15.
[26] 邵帅,张可,豆建民.经济集聚的节能减排效应:理论与中国经验[J].管理世界,2019,35(1):36~60;226.
[27] 孙慧,朱俏俏.中国资源型产业集聚对全要素生产率的影响研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(1):121~130.
[28] Elhorst,J.P..Spatial Econometrics:From Cross-sectional Data to Spatial Panels[M].Heidelberg:Springer,2014,479:480.