How can digital reform empower high-quality economic development? A quasi-natural experiment based on the National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone

Abstract

Abstract: Digital reform is profoundly changing the traditional relations of production and plays a key role in high-quality economic development. Different from the traditional technology governance mode and path, digital reform is to construct a governance form supported by emerging technologies. Taking the national-level comprehensive big data pilot area as a quasi-natural experiment, the study reveals the heterogeneous characteristics of digital reforms empowering high-quality economic development by adopting a double-difference model. It is found that digital reform has a positive facilitating effect on economic high-quality development through three paths:strengthening technological innovation capability, optimizing technological resource allocation, and enhancing the efficiency of technological use. In terms of differences in regional geographic location, business environment and human capital, the effect of high-quality economic development brought by digital reform is more obvious in the eastern region, regions with relatively poor business environment and regions with high levels of human capital. In addition, the promotion effect of digital reform on high-quality economic development is particularly prominent in regions with good institutional environments.

Key words: digital reform, big data comprehensive pilot zone, high-quality economic development, double difference

CLC Number:

DUAN Zhongxian, TENG Renyu. How can digital reform empower high-quality economic development? A quasi-natural experiment based on the National Big Data Comprehensive Pilot Zone[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2024(02): 50-60.

References

[1] 李建伟.中国经济增长四十年回顾与展望[J].管理世界,2018(10):11~23.
[2] 刘伟.我国经济增长及失衡的新变化和新特征[J].经济学动态,2014(3):4~10.
[3] 丁煌,马小成.数据要素驱动数字经济发展的治理逻辑与创新进路——以贵州省大数据综合试验区建设为例[J].理论与改革,2021(6):128~139.
[4] 王锋,王瑞琦.中国经济高质量发展研究进展[J].当代经济管理,2021(2):1~10.
[5] Chen L., Huo C. The measurement and influencing factors of high-quality economic development in China[J], Sustainability, 2022,14(15):1~24.
[6] 王芳,卜凡博.数字经济对经济高质量发展的作用机制研究[J].当代金融研究,2023(5):50~64.
[7] 岳欣.国家能力与经济发展——基于经济高质量发展目标的再思考[J].经济学家,2021(1):54~62.
[8] 王雪峰,曹昭乐.我国经济高质量发展的内涵、特征及要求[J].中国国情国力,2020(6):14~17.
[9] 左鹏飞,陈静.高质量发展视角下的数字经济与经济增长[J].财经问题研究,2021(9):19~27.
[10] Han J., He M., Xie H., Ding T. The Impact of Scientific and Technological Innovation on High-Quality Economic Development in the Yangtze River Delta Region[J], Sustainability, 2022(21):1~19.
[11] 刘淑春.中国数字经济高质量发展的靶向路径与政策供给[J].经济学家,2019(6):52~61.
[12] 徐迎,张薇.技术创新理论的演化研究[J].图书情报工作,2014(7):100~106.
[13] 张凤海,侯铁珊.技术创新理论述评[J].东北大学学报(社会科学版),2008(2):101~105.
[14] 毛凯军.技术创新:理论回顾与探讨[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(10):55~59.
[15] 裴长洪,倪江飞,李越.数字经济的政治经济学分析[J].财贸经济,2018(9):5~22.
[16] 张磊,王淼.西方技术创新理论的产生与发展综述[J].科技与经济,2008(1):56~58.
[17] 余志良,谢洪明.技术创新政策理论的研究评述[J].科学管理研究,2003(6):32~37.
[18] 刘伟,范欣.现代经济增长理论的内在逻辑与实践路径[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019(3):35~53.
[19] 王军,朱杰,罗茜.中国数字经济发展水平及演变测度[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2021(7):26~42.
[20] 彭靖里,邓艺,李建平.国内外技术创新理论研究的进展及其发展趋势[J].科技与经济,2006(4):13~16.
[21] 许秀梅,李敬锁,温琳.技术董事、技术资源配置与企业成长:来自上市公司的经验数据[J].科技进步与对策,2019(20):94~102.
[22] 黄璜,谢思娴,姚清晨,等.数字化赋能治理协同:数字政府建设的"下一步行动"[J].电子政务,2022(4):2~27.
[23] 黄燕.市场结构与技术创新研究述评[J].财经理论与实践,2001(5):4~6.
[24] 黄景贵.论创新理论的产生及其发展[J].青岛海洋大学学报(社会科学版),2000(2):32~37.
[25] 吴林海.技术创新与企业规模:基于美国的实证分析与对中国的启示[J].科学管理研究,2009(5):7~11.
[26] 丁茂华,袁庆明.论技术创新与制度创新关系的三个视角[J].社会科学家,2003(2):38~41.
[27] 蔡德林.试论制度创新决定技术创新[J].技术经济与管理研究,2012(1):36~39.
[28] 高培勇,袁富华,胡怀国,等.高质量发展的动力、机制与治理[J].经济研究,2020(4):4~19.
[29] 申雅琛,吴睿.数字经济推动区域经济高质量发展的影响研究[J].商业经济研究,2022(14):154~157.
[30] 杨旭,刘祎,黄茂兴.金融集聚对经济发展绩效与经济发展质量的影响——基于制度环境视角的研究[J].经济问题,2020(1):44~53.
[31] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展——来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020(10):65~76.