How Digital Transformation Can Improve the Resilience of High-tech Manufacturing Enterprises -Mediating Effect Based on Dynamic Capabilities

Abstract

Abstract: Creating new competitive advantages through digital transformation is an important means for my country to enhance the resilience and security of its industrial chain and supply chain.Based on the panel data from 2011 to 2022, this paper empirically analyzes the impact and mechanism of digital transformation on the resilience of high-tech manufacturing enterprises.The study shows that: First, digital transformation has a positive effect on the resilience of high-tech manufacturing enterprises. The conclusion still holds after using the instrumental variable method to solve the endogeneity problem and conducting a robustness test, and there are certain differences for different enterprises, regions, and industries. Second, the industrial chain association plays a positive regulatory role between digital transformation and the resilience of high-tech manufacturing enterprises; absorptive capacity, adaptability, and innovation capacity play a mediating role in digital transformation and the resilience of high-tech manufacturing enterprises. Third, there is a threshold effect between digital transformation and the resilience of high-tech manufacturing enterprises. The research conclusions help to clarify the relationship between digital transformation and the resilience of high-tech manufacturing enterprises, and provide important theoretical support and policy guidance for formulating reasonable digital policies, revealing the mechanism of digital transformation in enhancing the resilience of high-tech manufacturing enterprises, and promoting the resilience of high-tech manufacturing enterprises.

Key words: digital transformation, industrial chain linkage, high-tech manufacturing enterprises resilience, dynamic capabilities

CLC Number:

F425.3

ZHANG Hongchang, DING Rui. How Digital Transformation Can Improve the Resilience of High-tech Manufacturing Enterprises -Mediating Effect Based on Dynamic Capabilities[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2025(04): 1-11.

References

[1] 张良成,郭瑞硕,舒长江.数字经济赋能高新技术产业韧性:内在机理与实证检验[J].江西财经大学学报,2023(2):53~66.
[2] Meyer AD. Adapting to Environmental jolts[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1982,27(4): 515~537.
[3] 胡海峰,宋肖肖,窦斌.数字化在危机期间的价值:来自企业韧性的证据[J].财贸经济,2022(7):134~148.
[4] 贾勇,傅倩汪琳,李冬姝.技术创新与企业韧性:基于新冠疫情情景[J].管理科学,2023(2):17~34.
[5] 吴非,胡慧芷,林慧妍,等.企业数字化转型与资本市场表现:来自股票流动性的经验证据[J].管理世界,2021(7):130~144;10.
[6] 戴翔,马皓巍.数字化转型、出口增长与低加成率陷阱[J].中国工业经济,2023(5):61~79.
[7] 冯智明,陈曦.民族村寨的灾后重建与韧性治理研究:以广西桂林龙胜各族自治县金竹壮寨为例[J].广西民族研究,2022(4):83~90.
[8] 潘越,柯进军,宁博.不确定性冲击、政府采购与企业发展韧性[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024(4):193~212.
[9] 吴卫红,秦臻,张爱美,等.企业数字化转型与政府数字化治理对创新"提质增量"的协同影响机制研究[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024(2):42~58.
[10] 马亚明,徐会杰,王一婕.董事高管责任保险与企业ESG表现[J].广东财经大学学报,2024(4):70~84.
[11] Vial G. Understanding Digital Transformation: a Review And a Research Agenda[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019,28(2): 118~144.
[12] 许欣,桑硕.数字化转型与制造业出口竞争力:来自各分行业的经验证据[J].工业技术经济,2023(7): 68~73.
[13] Fally T. Production Staging: Measurement and Facts[R]. University of Colorado Boulder Working Paper,2012.
[14] 倪红福,龚六堂,夏杰长.生产分割的演进路径及其影响因素:基于生产阶段数的考察[J].管理世界,2016(4):10~23;187.
[15] 倪红福.全球价值链中产业"微笑曲线"存在吗:基于增加值平均传递步长方法[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2016(11):111~126;161.
[16] 肖旭,管源,黄鑫.数字经济背景下产业基础再造的协同机理研究[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版),2023(6):48~55.
[17] 张虎,高子桓,韩爱华.企业数字化转型赋能产业链关联:理论与经验证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023(5):46~67.
[18] 陈爱贞,陈凤兰,何诚颖. 产业链关联与企业创新[J].中国工业经济,2021(9):80~98.
[19] 姜能涛. 数字化转型"同群效应"对产业链关联的影响[J].现代管理科学,2023(4):36~45.
[20] 刘维刚,倪红福,夏杰长. 生产分割对企业生产率的影响[J].世界经济,2017(8):29~52.
[21] 张皓,赵佩玉,梁维娟, 等. 空间集聚、产业关联与企业创新[J].产业经济研究,2022(5):28~41.
[22] 袁淳,肖土盛,耿春晓, 等. 数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J]. 中国工业经济,2021(9): 137~155.
[23] 孙焱林,林源榕.产业关联与制造业产业结构优化升级:基于我国287个地级市数据的实证分析[J].城市问题,2021(6):72~82.
[24] 汤淑琴,汤培成,游艺.动态能力对科技型新企业竞争优势的影响研究[J].东华理工大学学报(社会科学版),2024(4):325~335.
[25] Warner K S R, Wäger M. Building Dynamic Capabilities for Digital Transformation: an ongoing Process of Strategic Renewal[J]. Long Range Planning, 2019,52(3): 326~349.
[26] Wang C L, Ahmed P K. Dynamic Capabilities: a Review and Research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2007,9(1): 31~51.
[27] 张吉昌,龙静.数字化转型、动态能力与企业创新绩效:来自高新技术上市企业的经验证据[J].经济与管理,2022(3):74~83.
[28] 陈胜棋.数字化转型、动态能力与零售效率[J].商业经济研究,2023(7):120~123.
[29] 张兴亮,范思佳.数字化转型赋能企业高质量发展的实证研究[J].长安大学学报(社会科学版),2023(6):48~59.
[30] 云乐鑫,董晓语,徐海卿,等.数字化转型如何赋能组织韧性:基于动态能力视角[J].财会月刊,2024(14):102~108.
[31] 郑涛,杨如雪. 高技术制造业的技术创新、产业升级与产业韧性[J].技术经济,2022(2):1~14.
[32] 黄宗远,王凤阳,阳太林. 数字化赋能传统制造业发展的机制与效应分析[J].改革,2023(6):40~53.
[33] 赵宸宇. 数字化发展与服务化转型:来自制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].南开管理评论,2021(2):149~163.
[34] 方明月,林佳妮,聂辉华. 数字化转型是否促进了企业内共同富裕:来自中国a股上市公司的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2022(11):50~70.
[35] 范合君,吴婷,何思锦. 企业数字化的产业链联动效应研究[J].中国工业经济,2023(3):115~132.
[36] Doran J., Fingieton B. US Metropolitan area Resilience:Insights From Dynamic Spatial Panel Estimation[J].Environment and Planning A:Economy and Space, 2018,50 (1):11~132.
[37] Fahlenbrach R, Rageth K, Stulz R M. How Valuable is Financial Flexibility When Revenue Stops? Evidence From the Covid-19 Crisis[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2021, 34(11): 5474~5521.
[38] 张伟,李航宇,张婷. 中国制造业产业链韧性测度及其时空分异特征[J].经济地理,2023(4):134~143.
[39] 王楠楠,崔登峰. 疾风知劲草:企业韧性评价指标体系与量化分析[J].工业技术经济,2023(2):86~95.
[40] Zheng H, Fang Q, Wang C, et al. Updating China's Input-output Tables Series using MTT Method and its Comparison[J]. Economic Modelling, 2018,74(C):186~193.
[41] 方红生,张军.中国地方政府竞争、预算软约束与扩张偏向的财政行为[J].经济研究,2009(12):4~16.
[42] 赵涛,张智,梁上坤.数字经济、创业活跃度与高质量发展:来自中国城市的经验证据[J].管理世界,2020(10):65~76.
[43] 杨刚强,王海森,范恒山,等.数字经济的碳减排效应:理论分析与经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2023(5):80~98.
[44] 江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):100~120.
[45] Seo M H, Kim S, Kim Y J. Estimation of Dynamic Panel Threshold Model using Stata[J].The Stata Journal,2019,19(3):685~697.