贵州财经大学学报 ›› 2025 ›› Issue (6): 21-31.

• 宏观经济 • 上一篇    

中国粮食体系韧性多维评估、时空演变及驱动机制研究

王力, 丁莎莎, 周乾晨   

  1. 石河子大学 经济与管理学院, 石河子 832003
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-28 发布日期:2025-11-24
  • 作者简介:王力,经济学博士,石河子大学经济与管理学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向:农业经济理论与政策;丁莎莎,石河子大学经济与管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:农业经济理论与政策;周乾晨,石河子大学经济与管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:资源环境经济与政策。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目"棉花'价格保险+期货’试点评估、激励探索与政策优化"(72163028);石河子大学中亚教育及人文交流研究中心资助委托课题"大食物观下深化中国与中亚五国的农业合作研究"(ZYJY2023001)。

Multidimensional Assessment, Spatio-temporal Evolution and Driving Mechanism of Grain System Resilience in China

WANG Li, DING Shasha, ZHOU Qianchen   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
  • Received:2025-07-28 Published:2025-11-24

摘要: 针对现有粮食体系韧性的研究多聚焦三维静态评价的局限,本研究构建"抵御-适应-恢复-更新"四维动态评价体系,综合运用Dagum基尼系数法、Kernel密度估计、Markov链与动态GMM系统,系统解析中国粮食体系韧性的时空格局演变与驱动机制。研究发现:(1)全国韧性整体提升但区域梯度分化显著(主产区0.42>主销区0.31>产销平衡区0.28),区域间差异贡献率(64.27%)成为分化的主导因素,且空间邻近效应显著驱动韧性状态转移,凸显韧性动态演化的空间依赖性;(2)四维能力发展严重失衡: 抵御力(0.290)、恢复力(0.265)相对较强,而更新力(0.148)构成核心短板,制约整体韧性水平;(3)区域类型特征各异:主产区综合优势明显但增长动能趋缓,主销区抵御与恢复能力薄弱,平衡区适应与更新能力显著不足;(4)交通基础设施与技术进步被识别为韧性提升的关键驱动因素。研究结果为制定差异化区域政策、优化农业资源配置及构建韧性保障体系提供了精准的科学依据。

关键词: 粮食体系韧性, 粮食安全, 时空演变, 多维评估, 动态GMM

Abstract: In view of the limitations of existing research on the resilience of the food system, which mainly focuses on three-dimensional static evaluations, this study innovatively constructs a four-dimensional dynamic evaluation framework encompassing "resistance, adaptation, recovery, and transformation." By integrating the Dagum Gini coefficient method, Kernel density estimation, Markov chains, and a dynamic GMM system, it systematically analyzes the spatiotemporal evolution patterns and driving mechanisms of grain system resilience in China. Key findings reveal: (1) While overall national resilience has improved, significant gradient differentiation exists across regions (Major Production Areas: 0.42>Major Consumption Areas: 0.31>Production-Consumption Balanced Areas: 0.28). Inter-regional disparities, contributing 64.27% to the overall differentiation, emerge as the dominant factor. Spatial proximity effects significantly drive resilience state transitions, highlighting the spatial dependency inherent in resilience dynamics. (2) Severe imbalance characterizes the development of the four resilience dimensions: Resistance (0.290) and Recovery (0.265) are relatively strong, while Transformation capacity (0.148) constitutes a core deficiency, constraining overall resilience levels. (3) Distinct regional characteristics are evident: Major Production Areas exhibit clear comprehensive advantages but decelerating growth momentum; Major Consumption Areas demonstrate weaknesses in resistance and recovery; Balanced Areas show significant deficiencies in adaptation and transformation. (4) Transportation infrastructure and technological advancement are identified as key drivers enhancing resilience. These results provide a precise scientific foundation for formulating differentiated regional policies, optimizing agricultural resource allocation, and building a resilient grain security system.

Key words: food system resilience, food security, temporal and spatial evolution, multidimensional assessment, dynamic GMM

中图分类号: