Research on the mechanism of environmental dynamics on Enterprise Performance-Intermediary effect based on technology orientation

Abstract

Abstract: In the context of high-quality development, Chinese enterprises are facing more and more uncertainties in the external economic environment, and the macro policy environment and industry environment are also becoming complex, dynamic and uncertain. How to understand and use technology-oriented strategy to adapt to the dynamic competitive environment has become an urgent problem in enterprise practice, and also the focus of academic research. Based on this, this paper studies the relationship between environmental dynamics and technology orientation, and puts the three into a unified analysis framework, constructs the intermediary effect model of technology orientation between environmental dynamics and enterprise performance, and makes empirical analysis through structural equation model. The results show that technology orientation has a positive correlation with corporate performance, and technology orientation has a significant intermediary effect on the relationship between environmental dynamics and corporate performance.

Key words: technology oriented, environmental dynamics, enterprise performance, intermediary effect

CLC Number:

C393

LI Zhao-hong, ZHU Zhi-yong. Research on the mechanism of environmental dynamics on Enterprise Performance-Intermediary effect based on technology orientation[J]. Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, 2020(05): 73-79.

References

[1] 李大元, 项保华, 陈应龙. 企业动态能力及其功效:环境不确定性的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2009(6):60~68.
[2] 王静. 新经济环境中技术创新的企业持续竞争优势策略[J]. 科技管理研究, 2009(6):1~2.
[3] 李杰义, 来碧波. 学习导向、技术导向与人力资源管理系统——基于组织均衡的视角[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019(16):159~166.
[4] 李影, 朱云海, 孙自愿. 技术导向和社会责任导向对企业绩效的影响研究[J]. 中国注册会计师, 2017(8):38~43.
[5] Hubert, Gatignon, Jean-Marc, et al. Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997,34(1):77~90.
[6] Voss G B, Voss Z G. Strategic Orientation and Firm Performance in an Artistic Environment[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2000, 64(1):67~83.
[7] 杜勇, 鄢波, 陈建英. 研发投入对高新技术企业经营绩效的影响研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2014(2):87~92.
[8] 梁莱歆, 金杨, 赵娜. 基于企业生命周期的R&D投入与企业绩效关系研究——来自上市公司经验数据[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010(12):11~17,35.
[9] Rauch, Watson. Network intermediaries in international trade[J].Journal of Economics&Management, 2004,13(1):69~93.
[10] S.C. Wheelwright, K.B. & Clark. Revolutionizing Product Development[M].New York:Free Press,1992.
[11] 于李胜, 江权. 环境不确定性、公司战略、组织结构对预算控制紧度的影响——基于中国中小企业的调查研究[J]. 管理会计学刊, 2014(1):110~129.
[12] 张骁,杨忠,徐彪. 技术导向、市场导向对组织绩效的混合影响:环境不确定性的调节作用[J]. 江苏社会科学,2013(4):84~91.
[13] N. Venkatraman. Performance Implications of Strategic Coalignment:A Methodological Perspective[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2007, 27(1):19~41.
[14] 焦豪, 周江华, 谢振东. 创业导向与组织绩效间关系的实证研究——基于环境动态性的调节效应[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007(11):72~78.
[15] 李忆, 司有和. 探索式创新、利用式创新与绩效:战略和环境的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2008(5):4~12.
[16] 陈傲. 循环经济技术范式变革与企业技术创新的生态化转向[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2007(5):53~56.
[17] Tan W A,Shen W,Zhao J. A methodology for dynamic enterprise process performance evaluation[J]. Computers in Industry, 2007, 58(5):474~485.
[18] Zhou K Z, Li C B. How does strategic orientation matter in Chinese firms?[J]. Asia Pacific journal of management, 2007, 24(4):p.447~466.
[19] Murphy G B, Trailer J W, Hill R C. Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research[J]. Journal of Business Research, 1996, 36(1):15~23.
[20] Waldman D A,Ramirez G G,House R J, et al.Does Leadership Matter? CEO Leadership Attributes and Profitability Under Conditions of Perceived Environmental Uncertainty[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(1):134~143.
[21] Han, H. The Relationship among Corporate Culture, Strategic Orientation, and Financial Performance[J]. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 2012, 53(3):207~219.